 | | Re: Noting gaps in parts sequences
|
|
(...) It hasn't been modeled yet because I wanted to get the other parts released without waiting for the oilcan. Then I got distracted. It will be a bit more challenging than the other tools, but now that I've got the LDAO Lathe, and have some (...) (26 years ago, 22-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDAO eating header comments
|
|
I'll see what I can do to make Rename not mess with non-standard headers. Steve (...) (26 years ago, 22-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDAO eating header comments
|
|
Thanks for reporting this. I'll get it taken care of. Steve (...) (26 years ago, 22-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | [NEWPART] - 2871 (?) Electric Train Motor Sides
|
|
Hello all, I've started working on decorative bearing mockups you clip on the sides of the 9V Electric Train Motor. I believe the part number is 2871, does someone know it for certain ? I've put an entry in the Tracked Parts List also. (URL) M. (...) (26 years ago, 22-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | ReRe: [PARTS] - Header keyword line
|
|
I asked: (...) Jacob Sparre Andersen answered: (...) ...... (...) What is your reason of excluding the "category -like" words Airport, Boat, Crane, Harbour, Train and Stadium ? I thought the keyword provision was to catch people looking for my part (...) (26 years ago, 22-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Digests
|
|
Until now, the News-by-Mail gateway to the lugnet newsgroups has only supported instantaneous message delivery: one e-mail message sent to you for each article appearing in your newsgroups. I am pleased to announce that the gateway now supports (...) (26 years ago, 22-Feb-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | MAX2DAT .5 beta is ready for the world
|
|
okay.. time for the first release.. anyone using 3DSMAX to model elements should be able to get some nice use out of this util... (URL) requires the use of a freeware ASCII export plugin which can also be found at the page... check it out... and, as (...) (26 years ago, 21-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Any hope for LDLite and MPD together?
|
|
Yes, MPD will be available for LDLite on the March 31 release (v. 1.7). I've done some behind-the-scenes restructuring of how files get loaded and parsed in support of some other stuff, and the MPD support will happen easily. However, you will need (...) (26 years ago, 21-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: MPD<->DAT conversion in Perl
|
|
(...) Oh. OK, no, it doesn't. Is there a spec somewhere on what characters are legal? There regex there should be m/[^a-zA-Z0-9_\-\.~#]/ to include ~ and #, but any other characters would need to be scrutinized very carefully to look for shell (...) (26 years ago, 21-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: MPD<->DAT conversion in Perl
|
|
(...) Are you sure this handles all the legal LDraw file names? I think both tildes (~) and hashed (#) are legal as well. Sorry if this comment is out of place, as I'm not too familiar with Perl. Other than that, your programs look useful. Fredrik (26 years ago, 21-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | MPD<->DAT conversion in Perl
|
|
I want to make sure I understand this MPD file format. I wrote two Perl programs, one for slurping up a nested tree of DAT's and producing an MPD, and one for splitting up an MPD back into DAT's. I'm not sure how useful these will be in future (...) (26 years ago, 21-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Noting gaps in parts sequences
|
|
I just noticed that the oilcan is missing from the 6246 group: (URL) this because it hasn't been modeled yet (maybe due to its complexity?) or is it just located elsewhere for some historical reason? Anyway, presumably it would go in as 6246F when (...) (26 years ago, 20-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Maintenance Idea
|
|
You are both right I actually meant that, since the date expressed in the example (ISO) was year month day I wasn't carefull enough when I read the other message. I don't know of a country which uses year day month. By the way I so what your talking (...) (26 years ago, 19-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Maintenance Idea
|
|
Sorry cancel that I didn't read it carefully enough Japan uses Year Month Day Benoit a écrit dans le message ... (...) are (...) (26 years ago, 19-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDAO eating header comments
|
|
(...) can (...) I've noticed this too. Updating the parts does the same thing and also tries to force the LDAO header format onto the model, even if there is a different header present. A fix would be great! Thanks. --Bram Bram Lambrecht / o o \ (...) (26 years ago, 19-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [PARTS] - Header keyword line
|
|
(...) None that I know of. If we can all agree on a general definition of these two meta-commands, I will add support for them to LDAO. My current definition for the meta-commands are (note: I've violated at least some of these rules): 0 CATEGORY (...) (26 years ago, 19-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [PARTS] - Header keyword line
|
|
(...) I'll try. I haven't looked through my L-CAD archive so the answers will be slightly vague. (...) None that I know of, but I expect it to be added to the parts searcher soon. (...) I think CATEGORY was intended for things that belonged in (...) (26 years ago, 19-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | LDAO eating header comments
|
|
Hey Steve, i've noticed over the last couple of days, while modeling all these wheels/tires that LDAO is doing something evil to my header lines... my max2dat export proggy automatically puts these lines in after the standard part/filename/author (...) (26 years ago, 19-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | [PARTS] - Header keyword line
|
|
Hello all, I'm thinking of adding a keywords line to my (updated) part files, but I don't know much about the functionality of this feature. A look in the FAQ didn't help me either. Could someone answer these questions I have ? 1. What programs use (...) (26 years ago, 19-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Any hope for LDLite and MPD together?
|
|
(...) Oops, sorry. Didn't read your post closely enough... Steve (26 years ago, 18-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
