Subject:
|
Re: Any hope for LDLite and MPD together?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Thu, 18 Feb 1999 21:35:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1076 times
|
| |
|
|
On Thu, 18 Feb 1999 20:14:29 GMT, "John VanZwieten"
<john_vanzwieten@msn.com> wrote:
>
> Steve Bliss wrote in message <36cc614e.2128629@lugnet.com>...
> > On Thu, 18 Feb 1999 18:23:39 GMT, "John VanZwieten"
> > <john_vanzwieten@msn.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Paul, do you have plans to make LDLite compatable with the MPD format? I • was
> > > reminded of this by the tyre posts to lugnet.cad. I think this would be a
> > > major improvement as far as the usefulness of lugnet.cad.dat. Of course the
> > > other major improvement for lugnet.cad.dat will be the planned Linux/UNIX
> > > version of LDLite. If it can be integrated into LUGNET, suddenly everyone
> > > with a web browser would have simple access to all the stuff posted to
> > > lugnet.cad.dat.
> >
> > Except Mac users...
> >
> > Steve
>
> Why not Mac users? If LDLite was on the LUGNET server, it could just send the
> output as a .gif file or such. It would be slower, of course, but wouldn't
> require a local copy of LDLite. I don't know anything about how to actually
> accomplish this, so maybe it's a pipe-dream. But the possibility is
> intriguing.
Oops, sorry. Didn't read your post closely enough...
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Any hope for LDLite and MPD together?
|
| Steve Bliss wrote in message <36cc614e.2128629@lu...et.com>... (...) was (...) Why not Mac users? If LDLite was on the LUGNET server, it could just send the output as a .gif file or such. It would be slower, of course, but wouldn't require a local (...) (26 years ago, 18-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
