To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 1938
1937  |  1939
Subject: 
Re: Voting page 9905 (JOSHUA D. Read this)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Wed, 2 Jun 1999 02:17:33 GMT
Viewed: 
1721 times
  
On Tue, 1 Jun 1999 03:10:31 GMT, Joshua Delahunty
<dulcaoin@alumni.cse.ucsc.edu> wrote:

> I wrote:
> > > > Here are the first couple years' use of this element.  If you (anyone,
> > > > anyone?) have one of these sets, and you're reasonably sure it's safely
> > > > been kept unintegrated, please take a look and see which type is in your
> > > > copy of any of these sets, and post:
> > > > 
> > > > Qty Color Set  U.S. Set Name             Year       Theme
> > > > --- ----- ---- ------------------------- ---------- --------------
> > > > 2   Grey  8850 Rally Off-Roader          1990       Model
> > > > 1   Grey  8815 Speedway Bandit           1991       Model
> > > > 2   Grey  8840 Rally Shock N' Roll Racer 1991       Model
> > > > 4   Grey  8838 Shock Cycle               1992       Model
> > > > 2   Grey  8828 Power Loader              1993       Model
> > > > 2   Grey  8836 Sky Ranger                1993       Model
> > > > 6   Grey  8868 Air-Tech Claw Rig         1993       Model
> 
> > legoverse@geocities.com (Terry K) writes:
> > 
> > >  So:  Circle=new  Rectangle=old.
> > >  So the piece in the current vote is of the new type - 2853b.dat
> 
> Fredrik Glöckner wrote:
> > 
> > I'm not sure if I agree with that.  Looking at the 8251, a 1999 set, it
> > looks like it has a rectangular slot:
> > 
> >     http://www.lugnet.com/pause/search/?query=8251
> > 
> > But then again, I haven't got the 8251, so it may very well be that the
> > parts included have the circular hole.  I dunno.
> 
> Gar, guh, gah, guh.... D'oh!  Did I _mention_ that conjecture wasn't
> allowed?
> 
> I KNEW this'd happen...  <sigh> <bg>
> 
> -----
> 1990:
> ----
> 8850: I bought mine used [and was ripped off by the buyer on this one,
> thank you VERY MUCH TERRY for bringing up THAT painful memory. :-P], so
> I can't be sure the elements are "stock."  (They're rectangular, even
> though it shouldn't matter for total scientific accuracy).

Made my day.   :->

> 1991:
> ----
> 8815: Rectangular
> 8840: Rectangular
> 
> 1992:
> ----
> 8838: "T" Shape, (both copies, one still with polybags intact)
>  [Uh-oh! I KNEW I'd find a way to make you PAY Terry! :)]

Oh, the pain.

> 1993:
> ----
> 8828: Rectangular
> 8836: "T" Shape
> 
> The "T" on the 8838's was quite pronounced.  The "T" on 8836 looks like
> a mistaken "ding" in the plastic, it's so subtle.  The others don't look
> "dinged" at all.
> 
> All sets are original, still in boxes (all opened, some built, but they
> all got back into the original boxes -- no I don't intend to keep them
> that way forever) -- except for 8850 [grrr -- it _burns_ :-P]
> 
> -----
> 
> I don't have anything modern sitting around that's guaranteed to have
> one, so I haven't even SEEN the circular that you talk about.
> 
> I'd say that rectangular is fairly certainly the original form.  Then
> "T", then probably circular.
> 
> In the end, they fit the "model"; that TLG is, over time, snipping off
> little bits of plastic everywhere it (they) can, to save on cost.  That
> would support rect->T->circ.
> 
>  -- joshua
> 
> Postscript: All kidding aside, I'm actually glad I had a reason to pull
> these out; it was suh-weet to walk down memory lane like that again.  To
> see all those early 90's sets all laid out... <sigh>   And the reminder
> that I had the extra 8838 (gift for a non-LEGO friend who subsequently
> returned it to me) still factory fresh (seal was broken and it's NOT for
> sale) was a nice "oh, yeah!" too.  It reminds me why I never toss the
> boxes...

Thanks for the archeology, Joshua.
So:
Rectangle = 2853a
T-shape    = 2853b
circle          = 2853c

-- Terry K --



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Voting page 9905 (JOSHUA D. Read this)
 
(...) Fredrik Glöckner wrote: (...) Gar, guh, gah, guh.... D'oh! Did I _mention_ that conjecture wasn't allowed? I KNEW this'd happen... <sigh> <bg> ----- 1990: ---- 8850: I bought mine used [and was ripped off by the buyer on this one, thank you (...) (27 years ago, 1-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)

27 Messages in This Thread:












Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR