Subject:
|
Re: LDraw and the Track Designer (Was: Next show)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Tue, 16 Feb 1999 13:30:00 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
100 times
|
| |
|
|
Larry Pieniazek (lar@voyager.net) wrote:
> Yep, that was EXACTLY what I was thinking of. The convertor should
> create the needed views (all the rotations), and if it can handle the
> scaling too, so much the better.
Shouldn't give any problems.
> I would convert EVERYTHING including track images, because expecting the
> convertor to understand something like a monorail/road station which has
> two monorail ports and two road ports is a bit much. It would be hard to
> get it to do the port commands right. Better to use tagging.
If we just register the port information for the relevant
parts (road plates, track, and monorail track), and inline
all sub-files (not including parts) the inlined version of
the model will contain indirect port information through the
position and orientation information for the track and road
parts.
> Perhaps some lines that LDraw views as remarks could be used, with a
> defined syntax, to handle stuff like the PORTS and port types. I believe
> there is precedent for doing that as well, isn't there, in the
> directives that can be embedded for L3P to use? I forget.
That might be an option, but a separate file could probably
do the job for now.
Play well,
Jacob
--------------------------------------------
-- E-mail: sparre@nbi.dk --
-- Web...: <URL:http://hugin.risoe.dk/> --
--------------------------------------------
LDraw FAQ: <URL:http://hugin.risoe.dk/JJ_Memorial/FAQ/>
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
17 Messages in This Thread:
   
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
