To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 10317
10316  |  10318
Subject: 
Re: Thoughts on File Format for LDraw Animation
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Thu, 27 Oct 2005 21:05:01 GMT
Viewed: 
2841 times
  
Kevin L. Clague wrote:

From the top level file all hierarchy is specified by LDraw 1.0.0
type 1 lines.

Yes, but you can give the 'files' any name you want inside the MPD. They
don't *have* to match the part name outside of the MPD. So you *can* get
named parts inside an MPD (with the help of a suitable 'post-processing'
program). I certainly didn't say it was the best way, only *a* way.

My point is that LDraw files, from their inception by James, are not
just static models.  They have the element of time.

OK. I've never used the STEP feature, so I forgot that.

Furthermore I think that named part instances could be quite handy
for building instructions.  I can list my reasons if you'd like.

There's no need. I think I know them :-)

I just don't think it is the best solution.  I see a possible
solution that could help animation, *and* building instructions:
named part instances.  Can you see my point?

Yes of course! I was just trying to point to the possibilities already
available in the existing file formats. I do believe a new format would be
much more effective, but the time frame for actually agreeing on a new file
format is indefinite...

--
Anders Isaksson, Sweden
BlockCAD:  http://web.telia.com/~u16122508/proglego.htm
Gallery:   http://web.telia.com/~u16122508/gallery/index.htm



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Thoughts on File Format for LDraw Animation
 
In lugnet.cad.dev, Anders Isaksson wrote: <snip> (...) Ah, yes.... but only if you leave it to a committee! LOL! As the who has, invented the most meta-commands (I know, no LPub experience), I just create what I need, and tell people about them. No (...) (19 years ago, 28-Oct-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Thoughts on File Format for LDraw Animation
 
(...) Ha, ha, ha.... I had this long winded response argument all typed out, and then Mozilla died. Probably divine intervention. Let me try and see if I can get this one out with less energy. According to this specification: (URL) provides two (...) (19 years ago, 26-Oct-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)

30 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR