 | | Re: Patterned Parts Summary available in the Parts Tracker
|
|
(...) Many thanks to Chris for developing this great resource! :) Following his lead, I've moved most of the results of my 'minifig pattern' pages into the still-developing request tracker. Pre-assigned pattern codes will show up on the PPS for (...) (22 years ago, 9-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: PT Part Queue Request
|
|
(...) OK, it's done. Let me know if there's any problem. Steve (22 years ago, 9-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Antialiasing lines and printed polygons
|
|
(...) Another nifty thing to do is to draw the printed polygons (type 3 and 4 lines in ldraw that don't use color 16) a second time in GL_LINE mode and antialias them along with the type 2 and type 5 edge lines. This gives you a nice cheap (...) (22 years ago, 9-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Patterned Parts Summary available in the Parts Tracker
|
|
To aid the review and allocation of pattern codes to the patterned (aka decorated) parts, a new Pattern Parts Summary has been added to the PT Reference (URL) Enter a part number in the "Patterned Part Summary" box to get a single page summary of (...) (22 years ago, 9-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | PT Part Queue Request
|
|
Hello Steve, is it possible to take all parts out of the part queue which have 2 normal certify votes? These are blogging up the queue and I have to scroll for parts which don't have the two necessary certify votes. Play well Carsten (22 years ago, 8-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: "s/41748s01.dat" @ Tracker
|
|
(...) Hello Franklin, Done now. Better late than never. Damien (22 years ago, 4-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: "s/41748s01.dat" @ Tracker
|
|
(...) please be my guest. (I don't have the time right now to hunt down the problem myself.) Don't forget to insert a comment to document your fix! ;-) (ex.): (...) Thanks, Franklin (22 years ago, 3-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: "s/41748s01.dat" @ Tracker
|
|
(...) Hello Franklin, Sorry to annoy you one more time. Tell me if I am wrong, I feel the hole is still here. May be a picture is better after all: (URL) have replaced the "Line 285" quad by a triangle instead of providing the correct point. This is (...) (22 years ago, 3-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: PT Problem Report
|
|
(...) Ran into a few more errors in the pictures, this time while viewing 48 segment primitives. Some of the 48 segment primitives showed pictures of their 16 segment counterpart. -Orion (22 years ago, 3-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: PT Problem Report
|
|
(...) I've fixed these images, and I'm researching the exact cause, to prevent future recurrences. Steve (22 years ago, 3-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | PT Problem Report
|
|
The picture displayed in the part details page for a fixed part seems to be that of the current version not the fixed version. I noticed this while viewing the updated connect primitives, so this may be isolated to just those primitives -Orion (22 years ago, 3-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Numbers Report - 2 July 2002
|
|
For comparison: 2002-07-02 - 095 / 171 / 193 / 230 / 132 (821) 2002-06-25 - 074 / 152 / 187 / 226 / 121 (760) 2002-06-08 - 085 / 073 / 261 / 219 / 094 (732) 2002-04-23 - 213 / 052 / 236 / 180 / 098 (779) 2002-04-14 - 141 / 057 / 224 / 243 / 094 (...) (22 years ago, 3-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Numbers Report - 2 July 2002
|
|
Stats for Unofficial Files 95 certified files. 171 files need admin review. 193 files need more votes. 230 have uncertified subfiles. 132 held files. (821 files total...) (22 years ago, 3-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Render suggestion
|
|
Hi all, I was having a parting out party last night, and Paul mentioned that it'd be nice if you could render filtered by part; specifically, choose to render only selected part (or parts) in the entire model, eg "show me all the technic bushes in (...) (22 years ago, 3-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: "s/41748s01.dat" @ Tracker
|
|
(...) [snip] (...) [snip] (...) OK, then, good. These were the two L3P error messages I saw when I downloaded the file after Orion fixed it. :-D So, I fixed these two warnings and reloaded the file. Thanks, Franklin (22 years ago, 2-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: "s/41748s01.dat" @ Tracker
|
|
(...) Hello Franklin, Don't be so hurry, let me reply. The hole mentionned is much bigger than the one patched by Orion. Better than a picture, L3P says it all (and even more): (...) 'C:\MESDOC~1\LDRAWUN...48S01.DAT' ~subpart Wedge 2 x 6 Double Left (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Classic Space Flag
|
|
(...) I know TLC has sometimes done things like this as both a sticker and as a printed part. I wanted to confirm that this had not happened in this case. (...) Yes, the sticker should be released as a separate part. The idea of shortcuts hasn't (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Possible PT bug
|
|
(...) Thanks for pointing this out. It has been fixed. Darn that cut'n'paste coding. I always miss updating something. ;) Steve (22 years ago, 2-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Polygon intersection
|
|
(...) bookmarks turned up this. (URL) pretty excited about it since it implements the whole thing in pure C code. I think I'm gonna have to paste it into the LEDIT mode of ldglite over the holiday just so I can play with it. Have fun, Don (22 years ago, 2-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Polygon intersection
|
|
(...) (URL) (22 years ago, 2-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Polygon intersection
|
|
(...) I don't know of any tools, but here's algorithm if that helps. (URL) (22 years ago, 2-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Classic Space Flag
|
|
(...) the basis for the design was a sticker (I already confirmed this in a personell email). I also confirm the others information: the sticker was a mirrored one and you could find it exclusivly in the 6970. beta-1 command base. but as author of (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Polygon intersection
|
|
Is there a tool to figure out the line at which 2 polygons intersect? -Orion (22 years ago, 2-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: "s/41748s01.dat" @ Tracker
|
|
(...) Thanks! ;-) Franklin (22 years ago, 2-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: attn: "BrickCaster" (re: s/41748s01.dat @ Tracker)
|
|
(...) I got it. Hole plugged. New File submitted. -Orion (22 years ago, 2-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: attn: "BrickCaster" (re: s/41748s01.dat @ Tracker)
|
|
(...) Perhaps he means this itty bitty little hole? (URL) (22 years ago, 2-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | attn: "BrickCaster" (re: s/41748s01.dat @ Tracker)
|
|
I don't have time to track down the error you cited ("(URL) feel free to fix the bug, if you'd like, or else post images (on BrickShelf's Gallery, for ex.) of the error if anyone else would like to step up and pinch-hit for me on this... ;-) Thanks, (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Possible PT bug
|
|
On the part details pages, The links to related parts datils page seem to self refer to the details page you are currently viewing. This is only for the Related Parts and then only for the Details Page links (i.e. not the Download link or Events (...) (22 years ago, 1-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: PT Suggestion
|
|
(...) Hmm. You're right - it's a good idea, and it would be hard to program. Prompted by Jennifer and Dan, I've added "Next File" and "Previous File" links on the part details page. I suppose those links could go on the review results page, too... (...) (22 years ago, 1-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Classic Space Flag
|
|
I have that part and it is a sticker-ed element. I have been going through my space sets as of late; cleaning the parts and replacing damaged/missing parts. The Classic Space has to be my favorite era of Lego (except of Star Wars of course, that's (...) (22 years ago, 1-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Another PT Suggestion
|
|
(...) Try something like that: (URL) (22 years ago, 1-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Classic Space Flag
|
|
(...) Likewise. But the odd thing is, I have two Beta-1 Command Base sets, and I own exactly zero such flags. Can anyone shed some light on this interesting question? XFUT to .general, naturally. LFB (22 years ago, 1-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | MOTM and SOTM winners for June 2002
|
|
I'm actually up to speed on this one. :-) The Winner of LDraw.org's Model Of The Month is: Sven Moritz Hein and his spot-on version of a classic 911 sportscar. Wow. Sven has a load of goodies to see on his webpage, and on Brickshelf - check it out. (...) (22 years ago, 1-Jul-02, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw) !
|
| |
| | Re: PT Author question
|
|
(...) Generally, I'd let the author of the fix handle it. But yeah, fixes to fixes are ok. (...) If you've tried to contact the author without a response, then it's ok to fix an official part. Steve (22 years ago, 30-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Classic Space Flag
|
|
(...) The only set that had this part was 6970 Beta-1 Command Base. I looked up the instructions for this set on Brickshelf and the flag seems to be completely missing from the instructions. I would surmise, based on other sets from the same time, (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Classic Space Flag
|
|
See: (URL) this part exist as a decorated/patterned element? Or was the flag-pattern strictly a sticker? Steve (22 years ago, 30-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | PT Author question
|
|
This is actually a double question: 1. For parts on the PT that are fixes of existing parts, it's it considered okay to upload a new version of the part, fixing any errors or hold vote comments that my exist? 2. What about for original parts if the (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: PT Suggestion
|
|
"Steve Bliss" <partsref@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:GyICs1.3o2@lugnet.com... (...) it (...) be (...) It's more complicated to program, but wouldn't it be an idea to show the next part that is similar to the one you've just looked at? Eg. you (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: PT Suggestion
|
|
(...) I've been thinking more about this, I'm not sure what a good "next" would be. The current (URL) queue page> works on sort of the current data. Posting a review upsets that sort, so it's hard to say "give me the next file after the one I just (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: PT Suggestion
|
|
(...) Define "next" in this context. With a good definition of "next" I think it would be great... (22 years ago, 30-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
