Subject:
|
Re: PT Suggestion
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Sun, 30 Jun 2002 14:57:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
541 times
|
| |
|
|
"Steve Bliss" <partsref@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:GyICs1.3o2@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.cad.dev, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > Define "next" in this context. With a good definition of "next" I think • it
> > would be great...
> At this point, I'm starting to think the best 'next file' function should • be
> basically random, with allowances to avoid (a) files you've already
> reviewed, (b) files that are in 'hold' or 'need admin review'.
It's more complicated to program, but wouldn't it be an idea to show the
next part that is similar to the one you've just looked at? Eg. you review a
minifig head, so the next part shown to you is another minifig head. If
there are no similar parts then a random part would be selected. Part
"similarity" could be based on part number, part description, and keywords.
Dan
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: PT Suggestion
|
| (...) Hmm. You're right - it's a good idea, and it would be hard to program. Prompted by Jennifer and Dan, I've added "Next File" and "Previous File" links on the part details page. I suppose those links could go on the review results page, too... (...) (22 years ago, 1-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: PT Suggestion
|
| (...) I've been thinking more about this, I'm not sure what a good "next" would be. The current (URL) queue page> works on sort of the current data. Posting a review upsets that sort, so it's hard to say "give me the next file after the one I just (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
