 | | Re: Planes for a new download-tool (2)
|
|
Yes sure I'm interested ... in the mean time I did the same for Windows and it worked fine ... so it seems we both solved the question of how to work with http .... but have you build in some logic already (what to download ... if it's up-to-date)? (...) (24 years ago, 20-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Windows 2000
|
|
On Tue, 18 Jul 2000 23:10:46 -0600, Tim Courtney wrote (in message <FxxIDy.7wF@lugnet.com>): (snip!) (...) Some folks can get *really* defensive of their favorite OS. That's all. (24 years ago, 20-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Windows 2000
|
|
On Wed, 19 Jul 2000 2:09:01 -0600, Selçuk Göre wrote (in message <3975621D.DD740346@s...ine.com>): (...) I'd agree there. WinME (Millenium Edition) is more of an evolution than a revolution. Win2000 is the bomb IMHO. (He said, typing on his G4 Mac. (...) (24 years ago, 20-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: question on naming - pirate guns vs. modern guns
|
|
(...) Me too. --Todd (24 years ago, 20-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: question on naming - pirate guns vs. modern guns
|
|
(...) IMHO, the disadvantages of "Pirate" and "WW" outweigh the disadvantages of "Modern" and "Archaic"... But I like best what Steve Bliss suggested most recently. --Todd (24 years ago, 20-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Planes for a new download-tool (2)
|
|
In a previous post, you asked about portability to Unix. I am writing a multi-threaded http download program in Linux. The back end http stuff already works fine. It shouldn't be too difficult for me to make it generic enough for general (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Windows 2000
|
|
(...) Millennium is just a new win9x with some additional bells and whistles and will not have any "revolutionary" new things. I doubt the difference between win98 and millennium will be more than the difference between win95 and win98. Of course (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Planes for a new download-tool (2)
|
|
Hy, I did some experiments using InstallShield. I think it's possible to download files from a http server using a additional dll providing the required functions for downloading. But there are some open issues now: 1) I would like some sort of (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | New website
|
|
Introducing: LDraw to Building Architecht Plus (for SimCity 3000 Unlimited) Visit it at: (URL) guys! Mike (24 years ago, 19-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Can I get a working version of LDraw Add-on?
|
|
It works after you reinstall??? If I had known that... Anyway, now a bunch of my system files are screwed up. My internet connection quits after a few... Oh well, (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Can I get a working version of LDraw Add-on?
|
|
I'm not the only one??? Cool, well that sucks but.... I thought it might have been somthing else but now that I think about it the only change I made to the system before rebooting was installing LDAO. I know that it works after you reinstall (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Windows 2000
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Ben Vaughan writes: snip [...] (...) Ben (& everyone) thanks for the pointers. I'll do a little more research as I have a week or so before I can borrow an external SCSI burner for the backup job. I think I'm leaning towards 2k (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Windows 2000
|
|
Hy Mike, I like the idea but I will have to have a deeper look into it ... With NT you will not have any problems using two CPU even if MLCad is single threaded (but it isn't some gui things run parallel) but in this case NT will properly give MLCad (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Windows 2000
|
|
On Mon, 17 Jul 2000 5:09:22 -0600, Rui Martins wrote (in message <Pine.GSU.4.10.10007...0@is-sv>): (...) Rui, Actually, NT and 2000 have much better memory management that 95/98. 95 and 98 will most likely only perform better on lower end machines (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Windows 2000
|
|
(...) I'm aware that this is not a Linux newsgroup, but I just have to comment this, as I find it somewhat misleading. I'm setting followup-to lugnet.off-topic.geek, which is a more suitable newsgroup. I'm sure you could install Linux on a 128MB (...) (24 years ago, 18-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: question on naming - pirate guns vs. modern guns
|
|
(...) It works for me. Thanks, Franklin (24 years ago, 18-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Command (1)
|
|
Hmm, I think I might add somthing to my dat extractor program(1) that would let you choose to convert the name to 8.3 formart when it's run. -Matt (1) http:\\rapturesoft.h...onvert.zip btw the program allows you easier removal of dat files from the (...) (24 years ago, 17-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Windows 2000
|
|
<snip> (...) bet (...) OS is (...) lines of (...) I installed 2k on a 133 with a 400 meg hd, and had enough room left to install word 97 and a few games, and it ran great too. I installed linux on the same box and x wouldn't work with the grpahics (...) (24 years ago, 17-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Can I get a working version of LDraw Add-on?
|
|
Hi, I was wondering if there were a functioning version of LDraw Add-on I could get. I have Windows98, and last time I tried to install it it screwed up my Explorer file and I had to delete the Windows directory and reinstall Windows. A real hassle! (...) (24 years ago, 17-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Windows 2000
|
|
Michael, I believe the reason that NT is faster in big machines is that it can address large amounts of memory more quickly. When I was discussing NT with a Photoshop expert, he said that for 128MB+ machines, it is much faster in NT, as Win9x can (...) (24 years ago, 17-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: parts tracker, where did it go?
|
|
(...) This site has been dead for some time. The current, but temporary, parts tracker is at (URL) as you suggest. Chris (24 years ago, 17-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Windows 2000
|
|
(...) A Bigger Hard Drive ? You have 12 Gig ! Linux Only requires about 128 Megs for system and programs (depending on which ones you will install) plus some extra 128 Megs (Maximum) of swap partition, but since you have 256 Megs of Ram, you can (...) (24 years ago, 17-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Windows 2000
|
|
(...) Ok. I'm running a PII 400 with 256mb ram, 12gb HD. I want 2000 cause of networking stuff and forced login when I get to college as well. NT doesn't support USB, which I need, and it also doesn't support a couple of other things (I forget which (...) (24 years ago, 17-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Windows 2000
|
|
(...) Yeah, so I've heard. As far as I'm concerned, as long as my Macromedia and Adobe stuff runs, along with MLCad and other LDraw utilities, I'm happy as a clam. I don't play many games at all. But I do waste time online chatting on AIM and (...) (24 years ago, 17-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: Windows 2000
|
|
I am successfully using a cross section of the LDraw related applications in Windows 2000. MLCad, LDraw Add On, L3Lab, L3P Add on, L3P and POV Ray. I have not tried to run LEdit or LDraw since MLCad and L3Lab can replace those pretty well in the (...) (24 years ago, 17-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: Planes & Requirements for a generic download-tool
|
|
(...) I'll work on this. (...) Security issues. Don't ask me more, because that's all I know. Steve (24 years ago, 17-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: question on naming - pirate guns vs. modern guns
|
|
(...) That settles the "is 'musket pistol' an oxymoron?" question. (...) If we go this way, flintlock is a better-known term, and so is probably a better choice for naming. (...) Is that the long musket or the pistol? ;) (...) (you've got the (...) (24 years ago, 17-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Speaking of colors...
|
|
(...) If you want the generally-accepted LDraw codes for various LEGO colors, look at (URL). If you want to see all the colors LDraw can generate, see the MPD color chart at (URL). Steve (24 years ago, 17-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Windows 2000
|
|
(...) You probably have a bad configuration on your Win95/98, possibly bad/slow/old drivers, try to updated them. The only advantage that you could have with NT is if you have more than one CPU. Since Win95/98 can't (don't now how to) use more than (...) (24 years ago, 17-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Windows 2000
|
|
I actually had MLCad installed on my Windows 2000, worked fine. However, I did have trouble with L3P... But that might have been my fault... ;-) Oh! BTW Tim, you do realize you certain software might not be able to run on 2000, like certain games... (...) (24 years ago, 17-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: Windows 2000
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Rui Manuel Silva Martins writes: <SNIP> (...) already (...) windows (...) That's somehow new for me, since at home (I'm using a PII 350 with 128MB-Ram) programs like MLCad are definitly faster on NT than on 95 or 98. Sure the display (...) (24 years ago, 17-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Windows 2000
|
|
(...) I can assure you that Windows 2000, has the "cmd" program of NT, i.e. the NT, DOS 7.0 compatible command interpreter. Here at work, several colleagues already are using it! And as it looks until now, it has improved on stability over NT. But I (...) (24 years ago, 17-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Windows 2000
|
|
I have never tried to run MLCad on 2000 since I do not have it, but until now I did not receive any hint that there are problems. From my best knowledge I can say I did no special thing in MLCad which would hinder it from running on 2000, beside (...) (24 years ago, 17-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: Speaking of colors...
|
|
Is there anywhere I can find a list of all specific colors that are used? -Matt Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:frqbms83t15r2kp...4ax.com... (...) to (...) edge (...) (24 years ago, 17-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | LDraw utility?
|
|
Hi, I was wondering if there were an LDraw utility like LDLite or L3Lab in which tou could adjust the lighting angle when viewing a file. Or, if the creator of L3Lab could implement a feature like this, it would be great! What I mean is that when I (...) (24 years ago, 17-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Windows 2000
|
|
I'm strongly considering purchasing Windows 2000 when I back up and reformat my system in the near future. I'm curious if MLCad and if LEdit will run in them. I know LEdit is for DOS, and Microsoft is doing away with DOS - so does that mean it can't (...) (24 years ago, 17-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | parts tracker, where did it go?
|
|
this link seems to be broken: (URL) shown on the lugnet.cad.parts page: (URL) ) Didn't the parts tracker move to here: (URL) one is what the ldraw.org site links to. I wanted to see if some parts were being worked. ++Lar (24 years ago, 16-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: question on naming - pirate guns vs. modern guns
|
|
Franklin W. Cain skrev i meddelandet ... (...) Shouldn't that be: Minifig Gun Musket Pirate Minifig Gun Pistol Pirate Minifig Gun Revolver WW Minifig Gun Pistol WW to push the theme dependency to the least significant end? (Is WW an accepted (...) (24 years ago, 16-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: question on naming - pirate guns vs. modern guns
|
|
(...) [sigh]... You've got a point. "modern" w/ respect to History != "modern" in mundane usage (...) Sorry, but once again, this opens up confusion. Which one of these is the pirate pistol? Which one is the pirate long-gun? (You see, not all (...) (24 years ago, 16-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: question on naming - pirate guns vs. modern guns
|
|
(...) Just as a casual LDraw user, I appreciate the effort to disambiguate the names by including "Archaic" vs. "Modern," but then again it wouldn't be obvious to me what "Archaic" meant and what "Modern" meant. If "Modern" applied to the Wild West (...) (24 years ago, 16-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
