| |
On Wed, 19 Jul 2000 2:09:01 -0600, Selçuk Göre wrote
(in message <3975621D.DD740346@superonline.com>):
>
>
> Tim Courtney wrote:
> >
> > Is Millenium the home user version like 9x has been? Or is it network-
> > oriented too like 2k??
>
>
> Millennium is just a new win9x with some additional bells and whistles
> and will not have any "revolutionary" new things. I doubt the
> difference between win98 and millennium will be more than the difference
> between win95 and win98. Of course it would be probably a little bit
> more stable and free of some very obvious security holes and bugs that
> win98 already have, but I don't think we could call it "network
> oriented" as in the sense of winNT or win2k.
>
> Selçuk
I'd agree there. WinME (Millenium Edition) is more of an evolution than a
revolution. Win2000 is the bomb IMHO. (He said, typing on his G4 Mac. <g>)
--
Thanks,
Ben
Ben Vaughan
buster@marsbase.com
http://www.marsbase.com
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Windows 2000
|
| (...) Millennium is just a new win9x with some additional bells and whistles and will not have any "revolutionary" new things. I doubt the difference between win98 and millennium will be more than the difference between win95 and win98. Of course (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
20 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
