 | | Re: Who Uses Original LDraw? (Was: ... Rocket Launch Pattern)
|
|
(...) Excellent point. However there are a lot of (in some ways incompatible) dialects of C. There ARE reference implementations for things like all the Java components (the javac compiler, the java jvm, the jms messaging, jca, the rmi server, etc (...) (20 years ago, 13-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Who Uses Original LDraw? (Was: ... Rocket Launch Pattern)
|
|
(...) Why have a replacement at all? The file format stands by itself. There's no reference complier for C code, no reference viewer for the PNG format, and no reference CAD program for the DXF format, why should there be one for the LDraw system? (...) (20 years ago, 12-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Who Uses Original LDraw? (Was: ... Rocket Launch Pattern)
|
|
(...) IIRC, the limit was only on the size of the root directory -- but I could well be wrong. I think there are two separate, and related, questions here: Do we want to keep supporting DOS as a platform? Do we want to keep supporting LDraw 0.27? (...) (20 years ago, 12-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Who Uses Original LDraw? (Was: ... Rocket Launch Pattern)
|
|
(...) Willy, You really got a good point here. I don't know if there is anyone that still uses original LDraw. And, I don't think the LDraw parts library is LDraw compatible anyway. At least not running under DOS - I think there was a limit of 2000 (...) (20 years ago, 12-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with Rocket Launch Pattern – RELOADED
|
|
Hi folks, I overhauled the Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with Rocket Launch Pattern - 3754p90.dat. (URL) Although this is the re-engineering of an existing LEGO part, it will NOT be submitted to the LDraw Parts Tracker for certification. It would never make it (...) (20 years ago, 12-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: N-Fedge primitives
|
|
(...) I missed responding to this one specific point. In general, aliases amongst the primitives would be a bad thing. They would primarily add more files to an already too-large list of primitives, and would only provide duplicate function. In this (...) (20 years ago, 9-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: N-Fedge primitives
|
|
(...) The consistency is in the basic four fractions: 1-4, 2-4, 3-4, 4-4. The other measures are (more or less) deliberate inconsistencies to name files that don't fit the basic standard. (...) Yes, that would be an incorrect consideration. Part (...) (20 years ago, 9-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: N-Fedge primitives
|
|
(...) It's not really that hard, but my mind recoils at a senseless inconsistency, and this, and the following, are it. Note that I suggested an alias, not move, and certainly not removing the existing names. (...) "0 Circle 1.0". 5-8edge should be (...) (20 years ago, 9-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, FTX)
|
| |
| | New parts: Scala Jewlery Rings [DAT]
|
|
Scala Jewelery Rings set 4306 contained three different sized rings. Unfortunately I have only two of these rings, so I could not create all three. As my two rings have a 1 and 3 imprinted between the studs, I think I have ring #1 (the smallest) and (...) (20 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: N-Fedge primitives
|
|
(...) Great - we are always looking for constructive help. (...) I don't see the benefit from this - the naming convention is well established and existing part authors know how to work with it. Is it that hard to learn? (...) Yes - as I have (...) (20 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | N-Fedge primitives
|
|
Hello, everyone. This was posted with NNTP, but seems to have dissappeared somehow, so I'm re-posting with the http interface. My appolgies if it turns up twice. I'm just getting started with LDraw, and returning to the lego-driven days of my youth, (...) (20 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Bionicle: 47295 Matoran Chest
|
|
Is there anyone working on this part? I got the above information from Bricklink but could not find the part in the parts tracker. I'm working (as budget permits on a scorpion using pneumatics and found this part (which I have a number of) useful (...) (20 years ago, 7-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Roadsign Triangle with Men Working, 1 Dirt Pile Pattern [DAT]
|
|
(...) The definitive version is attached to this message. Jaco 0 Roadsign Triangle with Men Working, 1 Dirt Pile Pattern 0 Name: 649PX1.DAT 0 Author: Jaco van der Molen (jmolen@zonnet.nl) 0 Unofficial part 4 4 22 -70 -2 22 -68 -2 -22 -68 -2 -22 -70 (...) (20 years ago, 6-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Sub-part numbers for Monorail Point/Switch Right
|
|
(...) Based on a delivery note from Lego for some replacement parts I believe the correct part number for the pantograph arm is 2923 292326 - Black pantograph arm 287126 - Black motor side plate 241226 - Black grille tile now Black is Lego colour 26 (...) (20 years ago, 3-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Roadsign Triangle with Men Working, 1 Dirt Pile Pattern
|
|
(...) <SNIP> Looks good to me. Chris (20 years ago, 3-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Roadsign Triangle with Men Working, 1 Dirt Pile Pattern
|
|
(...) Strange, because I copied this from the other patterned parts 649p01, 649p02 and 81294. This problem occurs here too. I do not think, however that this is very disturbing? Ortherwise it should be corrected. I will try and take a look at this (...) (20 years ago, 3-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Roadsign Triangle with Men Working, 1 Dirt Pile Pattern
|
|
(...) Jaco! The top corner of the red frame is somehow misaligned comparing to the rounded top corner of the s\649s01.dat. With high zoom factor it can be easily noticed. Otherwise the granularity of the pattern is sufficient. Bye Ampi (20 years ago, 3-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Roadsign Triangle with Men Working, 1 Dirt Pile Pattern [DAT]
|
|
It has been a while, but I have created a new part. Almost done, but I would like an opinion on whether the detail of the pattern would be sufficient. I have posted an image on Brickshelf: (URL) DAT file is attached to this message. Jaco 0 Roadsign (...) (20 years ago, 3-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: My second part: Fabuland Window part, 3 windows on top
|
|
(...) Yes, that's the thing that caused errors, so I had to correct them. The other adjustments I made was, was to remove some multiple spaces. I guess they were put there to create an even table with straght columns (alternatively just the way (...) (20 years ago, 2-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: My second part: Fabuland Window part, 3 windows on top
|
|
(...) <SKIP DAT file> Dear Tore, Thanks for the revision and the correction of this part. Could you tell me what mistakes I made in the previous version, so that I can avoid making the same mistakes with other parts again. I've tried to compare your (...) (20 years ago, 2-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
