| |
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, James Mastros wrote:
| |
Chris Dee wrote:
| |
| |
I think we should create a 1-1edge, and a 1-2edge as aliases for 4-4edge
and 2-4edge (respectively), so we have all of them available in least
terms.
|
I don’t see the benefit from this - the naming convention is well
established and existing part authors know how to work with it. Is it that
hard to learn?
|
It’s not really that hard, but my mind recoils at a senseless inconsistency,
and this, and the following, are it. Note that I suggested an alias, not
move, and certainly not removing the existing names.
|
The consistency is in the basic four fractions: 1-4, 2-4, 3-4, 4-4. The other
measures are (more or less) deliberate inconsistencies to name files that don’t
fit the basic standard.
Yes, that would be an incorrect consideration. Part files are found in the
/parts directory.
| |
| |
For the sake of tidiness and for
consistency with the other *edge.dat primitive that do have headers, I have
added a revised 5-8edge.dat file to the Parts Tracker.
|
Great, but 4-4 is the one I was really worried about, not 5-8. I realize
this is pedantic, but I decided to start with the trivial, and work my way up
to the more complex.
|
I’ve submitted a fix to 4-4edge.dat, merging the header from the 0.27 version
with the code from the 1998-10 version.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: N-Fedge primitives
|
| (...) It's not really that hard, but my mind recoils at a senseless inconsistency, and this, and the following, are it. Note that I suggested an alias, not move, and certainly not removing the existing names. (...) "0 Circle 1.0". 5-8edge should be (...) (20 years ago, 9-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, FTX)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
