| |
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, James Mastros wrote:
| |
Note that I suggested an alias, not
move, and certainly not removing the existing names.
|
I missed responding to this one specific point.
In general, aliases amongst the primitives would be a bad thing. They would
primarily add more files to an already too-large list of primitives, and would
only provide duplicate function.
In this specific case, I think alias files would be counterproductive. Instead
of making things clearer for newcomers, they would only muddy the situation
further.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: N-Fedge primitives
|
| (...) It's not really that hard, but my mind recoils at a senseless inconsistency, and this, and the following, are it. Note that I suggested an alias, not move, and certainly not removing the existing names. (...) "0 Circle 1.0". 5-8edge should be (...) (20 years ago, 9-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, FTX)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
