 | | Re: x468s01 - for Minifig Book
|
|
(...) Mark, Thank you for looking at my file; I do appreciate feedback. However, I don't use most of the box primitives because, in my mind's eye, they just aren't boxes. (Except box4 and box5, if I recall correctly; those I can deal with just (...) (21 years ago, 24-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: x468s01 - for Minifig Book
|
|
(...) I would use the box3u2p primitve for the inside. (21 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 33009, Minifig Book
|
|
(...) Heh... Guess which file I forgot to copy from home! ;) (21 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | 33009, Minifig Book [DAT]
|
|
Please LMK WYT.... 0 Minifig Book 0 Name: 33009.dat 0 Author: Franklin W. Cain 0 Unofficial File 0 BFC NOCERTIFY 0 CATEGORY Minifig Accessory 0 KEYWORDS Belville, Castle, Harry Potter, container, hollow book 0 KEYWORDS library, bookcase, bookshelf, (...) (21 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | x468 - for Minifig Book [DAT]
|
|
Last of the three "open usage" files....... 0 ~Minifig Book (Rear or "Female" Half) 0 Name: x468.dat 0 Author: Franklin W. Cain 0 Unofficial File 0 BFC NOCERTIFY 1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 s\x468s01.dat 0 0 decorated surface 0 4 16 -34 -27 -1 0 (...) (21 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | x467 - for Minifig Book [DAT]
|
|
one of three "open usage" files...... 0 ~Minifig Book (Front or "Male" Half) 0 Name: x467.dat 0 Author: Franklin W. Cain 0 Unofficial File 0 BFC NOCERTIFY 1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 s\x467s01.dat 0 0 decorated surface 0 4 16 34 -27 -1 0 -27 -1 0 (...) (21 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | x466 - for Minifig Book [DAT]
|
|
one of three "open usage" files........ 0 ~Minifig Book (Spine) 0 Name: x466.dat 0 Author: Franklin W. Cain 0 Unofficial File 0 BFC NOCERTIFY 1 16 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 1 s\x466s01.dat 1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 1 s\x466s01.dat 1 16 0 0 0 -1 0 0 (...) (21 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | x468s01 - for Minifig Book [DAT]
|
|
Last of the three subfiles... 0 ~Minifig Book Book (Rear/"Female" Half) -- Minus Surface 0 Name: s\x468s01.dat 0 Author: Franklin W. Cain 0 Unofficial File 0 BFC NOCERTIFY 1 16 -17 0 -1 17 0 0 0 0 27 0 3 0 box5.dat 0 1 16 -17 0 2 16 0 0 0 0 26 0 6 0 (...) (21 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | x467s01 - for Minifig Book [DAT]
|
|
One of three subfiles... 0 ~Minifig Book (Front/"Male" Half) -- Minus Surface 0 Name: s\x467s01.dat 0 Author: Franklin W. Cain 0 Unofficial File 0 BFC NOCERTIFY 1 16 17 0 -1 17 0 0 0 0 27 0 3 0 box5.dat 0 4 16 33 -26 2 33 26 2 33 26 4 33 -26 4 4 16 (...) (21 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | x466s01 - for Minifig Book [DAT]
|
|
One of three subfiles... 0 ~Minifig Book (Spine) -- Minus Surfaces (x1/4) 0 Name: s\x466s01.dat 0 Author: Franklin W. Cain 0 Unofficial File 0 BFC NOCERTIFY 4 16 -5 -27 -1 -5 0 -1 -5 0 0 -5 -27 0 4 16 -2 -27 -2 0 -27 -2 0 -27 -1 -5 -27 -1 4 16 -5 (...) (21 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | I can't load my new files...
|
|
...Because someone took my part numbers. Well over a year ago (closer to two years ago, if memory serves), I was given the range of x460 through x489 for any LDraw file I wrote whose part number I didn't know. (These are called "temporary part (...) (21 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: Modulex\brk0220.dat - Modulex (R) Brick 2 x 20
|
|
(...) OK, I see the problem. (...) This is a good idea. So I would agree with that. CU Bernd (21 years ago, 20-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: Modulex\brk0220.dat - Modulex (R) Brick 2 x 20
|
|
(...) I'm inclined to agree, as I have been struggling with this conceptual problem, since borrowing a selection of Modulex with the intention of authoring some parts for LDraw. Are there any Modulex parts that _do_ actually bind with regular LEGO? (...) (21 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: Modulex\brk0220.dat - Modulex (R) Brick 2 x 20
|
|
(...) Have you really considered the consequenses when modelling? It will be almost impossible to calculate the positions of the parts. Or at least very, very time consuming. /Tore (21 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: Modulex\brk0220.dat - Modulex (R) Brick 2 x 20
|
|
(...) I think the scale of Modulex parts should hardcoded (62.5% of normal size in dat-code). No separation. So it has the same norm as the "normal" Lego parts (1 mm = 2.5 LDU). CU Bernd (21 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: Modulex\brk0220.dat - Modulex (R) Brick 2 x 20
|
|
(...) Sorry, wrong ng... :) FOT: lugnet.cad.dat.parts (21 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig Helmets
|
|
(...) Thanks for doing the research. As a result, I think "Chin Guard" is preferable. Chris (21 years ago, 18-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig Helmets
|
|
<all the stuff I agree with snipped, leaving only the trivial> (...) I agree with the idea, but is "Chin-Guard" a standard word? It's not in either dictionary.com or m-w.com (I really need to get my books out of storage. . .) and a Google search on (...) (21 years ago, 18-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig Helmets
|
|
(...) I can go along with that! ;) (Good catch, by the way! ;) (21 years ago, 18-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig Helmets
|
|
(...) I agree and prefer Chin-guard too. (...) Doh - no, of course not. I meant 193a : Minifig Helmet Classic with Thin Chin-guard 193b : Minifig Helmet Classic with Thick Chin-guard (...) Chris (21 years ago, 17-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig Helmets
|
|
(...) So, by your own logic, the classic helmets should be: (...) (I personally think the above makes more sense, incidentally. None of the helmets have chin straps, because that would have to go under the chin.) On a side note, are those supposed (...) (21 years ago, 17-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig Helmets
|
|
(...) I'm partial to Chin-Guard. A chinstrap is a miniature belt that braces itself against your chin to hold your helmet onto your head. A chin-*GUARD* on the other hand protects your chin. (...) I like the inclusion of Castle. But we should (...) (21 years ago, 17-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig Helmets
|
|
(...) And they lived happily ever after... :-)))) (...) Chin-Guard or Chinstrap? (...) suggestion: x527 - Minifig Helmet Castle with Chinstrap and Wide Brim (...) w. (21 years ago, 17-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig Helmets
|
|
(...) I'd like to reach closure on this in preparation for the next parts update. I have re-thought my decsion about 193+593 vs. 193a+193b, mainly in the light of the Classic Window discussion, where we are allowing suffices on 3DNs. And I also take (...) (21 years ago, 17-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Naming of parts
|
|
(...) Perhaps the above mentioned (and other similar) parts would best be called "wedge plates". Wedge due to the shape and plate due to the thickness. There is such a variety of shapes and shapes there will always be exceptions to whatever (...) (21 years ago, 17-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | 3 new primitives for Technic Link Chain Old [DAT]
|
|
I forgot to include the three new primitives, I created for the Technic Link Chain Old: 3-8ring1.dat 3-8ring5.dat 3-8rin12.dat 0 Ring 1 x 0.375 0 Name: 3-8ring1.dat 0 Author: Niels Karsdorp 0 Unofficial Primitive 0 BFC CERTIFY CW 4 16 1 0 0 0.9239 0 (...) (21 years ago, 7-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New part: Technic Link Chain Old [DAT]
|
|
0 Technic Link Chain Old 0 Name: x.dat 0 Author: Niels Karsdorp <nkp@dds.nl> 0 Unofficial Element 0 BFC CERTIFY CW 1 16 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 16 rect.dat 1 16 0 0 10 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 stud.dat 1 16 0 0 -10 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 stud.dat 1 16 8.5 7.5 16 (...) (21 years ago, 7-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Naming of parts
|
|
(...) By this metric, (URL) not a wing. That's reasonable. If 2413 were a wing, then so would (URL) they are the same shape, essentially. (...) I agree. There are, however, times when that is not possible---for example, (URL) undoubtedly similar (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Naming of parts
|
|
(...) Another point to consider in differentiating between a wedge and a wing. IMHO a wing is not symmetrical and has a matching counterpart (left & right) and would be inherently thin. I cant imagine building a plane model with a wing as thick as a (...) (21 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: curved monorail track
|
|
(...) I know, this is a late reply, but I've finished it. The "Monorail Track Curve Quarter" (2672) is at the tracker now. (URL) Bernd (21 years ago, 5-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Naming of parts
|
|
(...) Doh! I posted without reviewing the current conventions. I suppose I could have inferred that the correct orientation puts the narrow (or corner-less) edge toward the front along the long axis of the part? Thanks for the quick answer, though! (...) (21 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Naming of parts
|
|
(...) Then you'd just use "Plate 4 x 8 Without Corner Left" and "Plate 4 x 8 Without Corner Right" -Orion (21 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Naming of parts
|
|
(...) If LEGO were to produce a rectangular plate, say a 4x8, with a missing corner, what would be a good way to describe it? The part could easily have a mirror-image part, so it wouldn't be enough to say "Plate 4 x 8 without corner," since that (...) (21 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Naming of parts
|
|
(...) This one should be Wing 3 x 4 (...) These ones are plates with one corner clipped, I think the 'Without Corner' label is better than Wing. I'd like to add these ones to the list: 2621 2625 I had renamed 2625 while it was on the PT for BFC (...) (21 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Naming of parts
|
|
(...) How about these two: 30033 Plate 2 x 2 with Rod Frame Octagonal (URL) 30094 Bar 4 x 4 with 4 Studs (No entry at LUGNet) I suggest changing the last to: 30094 Plate 2 x 2 with Rod Frame Rectangular Christian (21 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Naming of parts
|
|
(...) The following official parts do not follow this rule: 4859 32059 2401 2450 2419 30503 6106 (21 years ago, 3-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Naming of parts
|
|
(...) In general, a wedge is a 'clipped' brick and a wing is a 'clipped' plate. I don't see any exception to this rule in the official library but if an exception exists on the PT then those part should be commented upon. -Orion (21 years ago, 3-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Dishes are Round (Cornbread are Square)
|
|
(...) Yes, I thought I had checked the inclusion of these keywords. I'll recheck them. Chris (21 years ago, 3-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Naming of parts
|
|
(...) I agree that some parts still need renaming. Those you mention are good candidates for an overhaul. We do rely on them getting reviewed quickly on the Parts Tracker. When a part is submitted to the PT for a name change it should not be (...) (21 years ago, 3-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Dishes are Round (Cornbread are Square)
|
|
(...) I think so, yes. Because many people look them up with "Space" in their mind. That is why I started this discussion in the first place. Jaco (21 years ago, 3-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
