 | | error in part 30136 1X2 log brick
|
|
has anyone noticed that this piece is missing one of its edge lines, the vertical on that seperates the two 'logs' on one side Tim David (23 years ago, 14-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | DAT for 8466's "wheel holder", part# unknown
|
|
Has anyone created a DAT for the ball joint steering and suspension assembly that is found in the 8466 set? Here is a scan of the part I'm talking about: (URL) (23 years ago, 14-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 4511.dat Train Door Sliding - Type 1 doesn't have texture? [DAT]
|
|
(...) In recognition of the great models at Milton Train Works, here is an improved version of 4511. I changed the surface lines to true ribs, added the dimples and mounds, and the two lugs on the rear side. Any comments - please let me know. Chris (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 4511.dat Train Door Sliding - Type 1 doesn't have texture?
|
|
(...) I think some updated shutters have been submitted to the Parts Tracker. (...) I don't think so. I'm not finding a more recent version. (...) I'm not sure about this. I haven't examined this part in detail recently... (...) Not I. (...) Email (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | 4511.dat Train Door Sliding - Type 1 doesn't have texture?
|
|
Just as with my query some time back about shutters and texture... I think the real part has texture (or else i am using the wrong part) but the LDraw version just has lines drawn on it, I think. It renders in POVRay as a flat slab. Do I have a (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Horse parts in the parts tracker
|
|
Sorry to reply to myself, I forgot a couple of things (or 1 thing, repeated a few times). For all of the decorated parts (listed below), you might add a new line to the header (between the 'unofficial element' line and the first command line) like: (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Horse parts in the parts tracker
|
|
(...) Thanks for doing this. I apologize for not posting the files when you sent them to me. :( This is an amazing undertaking. 27 files, 12 different parts, and 382Kb of data! I don't remember who worked on which parts. Tore started the horse (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Horse parts in the parts tracker
|
|
"Damien Guichard" <damien.guichard@wanadoo.fr> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:Gpn5J2.Bu7@lugnet.com... (...) I resized the 48/1-4ring.dat to fit the lo-res one. Therefore I also refit the s/4492s.dat. (23 years ago, 9-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Horse parts in the parts tracker
|
|
(...) When converted by L3P and POV-rendered I have problems with the horse head. The problem is that the 48/1-4ring4 primitives are oversized. Damien (23 years ago, 8-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Horse parts in the parts tracker
|
|
Hi, I've put now the horse parts 4492-4494 and the subparts into the parts tracker. Sascha (23 years ago, 8-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: x191 & x192 part in the Parts tracker
|
|
(...) No, they don't have to be completely accurate. More accuracy is better, though. (...) Right. (...) Right, exactly. Nearly 100% of the usage will be the shortcut file. But LEGO identifies the top and bottom as two separate items, so we should (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | 32195 Suspension Arm with Towball Socket [DAT]
|
|
This is my first part i have created. It is not the best, but i think i did a pretty good job. The reason i chose to make this part is because i noticed some people need it, i myself needed it so i took it upon myself to make it. It does not have (...) (23 years ago, 4-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: x191 & x192 part in the Parts tracker
|
|
(...) Hi Steve, A question for the top & bottom part: Must the top & bottom part be 100 percent accurate? I mean the sides that aren't visible when using it as an assembled piece? I have alreddy 2 parts, but they need some more work if they need to (...) (23 years ago, 4-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: x191 & x192 part in the Parts tracker
|
|
(...) But you'll need two parts -- one for the top of the connector, and one for the bottom. And a third for the two put together... Steve (23 years ago, 4-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 30293 & 30294 Anyone ?
|
|
no. I got distracted by another part and haven't started on these yet : ( Jake McKee <sink@countersinkdg.com> wrote in message news:GpE7Ey.J5H@lugnet.com... (...) (23 years ago, 4-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 30293 & 30294 Anyone ?
|
|
(...) Did you have any luck on this? Jake --- Jake McKee AFOL LUGNET Member #211 (23 years ago, 4-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: x191 & x192 part in the Parts tracker
|
|
(...) Hallo Carsten, First of all, Best Wishes for the New Year, or should i say : Prosit Neujahr ? 1) Thanks a lot for the info. I will remove the electric wire at the point where it leaves the connector, so that you can't look through the part (...) (23 years ago, 1-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: x191 & x192 part in the Parts tracker
|
|
Hello Ludo, (...) There (...) I am/Was the reviewer. It is a very nice part. IMHO the wire should be removed and made a subpart of it. This subpart should be very very short so that you can use a tool like the Emacs Bendable thingie Creater to model (...) (23 years ago, 29-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | x191 & x192 part in the Parts tracker
|
|
Hi, I looked to the parts tracker review for my posted parts x191 & x192. There seems to be an overlay error, and the reviewer * Deckard * thinks that i should remove the electric wire. I can do this verry easily, so this means also that both pieces (...) (23 years ago, 29-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Monorail Track
|
|
(...) I think you got the Y positioning right. Steve (23 years ago, 28-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
