 | | Re: Questions on part #30296
|
|
(...) There are two of them in the Chrome Crusher #4970 I'd guess that if not allready, then sooner or later, there will be a version without the "scratches" almost all the "danger striped" pieces in that set have scratches, propably from falling (...) (25 years ago, 10-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: Castle Shield with Black Falcon Pattern
|
|
(...) Sorry Joachim, but I don't see any holes when I view this in MLCAD (V 1.4), nor with L3P or LDLite. Does anyone else see holes in this patterned part? If you could eMail be an image showing error this I will take another look. Chris (25 years ago, 10-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Yep
|
|
Thats the one, thanks :) (...) (25 years ago, 10-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Questions on part #30296
|
|
(...) I think -- but don't know for certain (my Lego stuff is at home, where I *don't* have internet access yet) -- that this piece is available plain/unpainted. Thanks, Franklin (25 years ago, 10-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: looking for a certain part...
|
|
Is this what you're looking for? (...) (25 years ago, 10-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | looking for a certain part...
|
|
I'm looking for the technic seat with armrests. Anyone knows if it's been done? I made some technic models out of mlcad but thy're still incomplete without the seat :( (25 years ago, 10-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Questions on part #30296
|
|
(Needed a break from the horse modelling, so I picked a relatively easy part...) I have a weird looking part numbered 30296. It has yellow and black danger stripes with chrome stains and must be from set #4940 Granite Grinder. I've made a mockup (...) (25 years ago, 10-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: Castle Shield with Black Falcon Pattern
|
|
Hi Chris, (...) There seams to be the same bug like in the first you posted. When looking straight at the front side in ml-cad, there are two holes at the pattern near the lower end of the shield. Ciao, Joachim. (25 years ago, 9-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: Castle Shield with Wolfpack Pattern [DAT]
|
|
(...) This has now been revised to allow more re-use of patterns as subparts 0 FILE 3846p44.DAT 0 Castle Shield with Wolfpack Pattern 0 Name: 3846p44.DAT 0 Author: Chris Dee (chris_w_dee@hotmail.com) 0 Unofficial Element 1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 (...) (25 years ago, 8-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: Castle Shield with Black Falcon Pattern [DAT]
|
|
(...) This has now been revised to allow more re-use of patterns as subparts 0 FILE 3846p43.dat 0 Castle Shield with Black Falcon Pattern 0 Name: 3846p43.dat 0 Author: Chris Dee (chris_w_dee@hotmail.com) 0 Unofficial Element 1 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 (...) (25 years ago, 8-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: Castle Shield with Black Falcon Pattern
|
|
(...) I'm confused. I looked at these and the other bowties Franklin reported. All look OK to me, by visual inspection, through L3P -check and in MLCAD. Could another parts author please check these over - it should be easy enough just by visual (...) (25 years ago, 8-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Horse Progress Report
|
|
(...) Just try not to make a mesh of things. (...) I've taken two or three horses apart. Be a bit careful, to avoid marring the edges where the two halves come together. Steve (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Horse Progress Report
|
|
(...) Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Horse Progress Report
|
|
(...) Thanks. :) (...) Thanks for the hint, Steve. I'll give it a try. But if you're wrong, my daughter will not be too happy about you! :o) /Tore (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Horse Progress Report
|
|
(...) It's looking good. I think your mesh is fine. BTW, you can dissassemble a horse using a letter opener. The two halves of the body are just friction-fit together, not permanently connected (ie, they are not glued, cemented, nor welded). I think (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | recommendation for stl2dat (was Re: Are anybody working on the Star Wars Battle Droid arms?)
|
|
A few recommendation when using CAD -> convert program(ex:stl2dat) to modelise parts: - The tesselation paramater should be set so that a regular cylinder is output with 16 facets. In Solidworks, this is done by setting the minimum angle to 22.5 deg (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 167.dat Technic Liftarm 1x7 decorated (also known as Throwbot leg, or Starwars battle droid arm)
|
|
(...) Thanks. Also thanks to Solidworks team for their powerful tool ! (...) Yes. The STL format says that the triangles must be CW, so of course stl2dat keeps this information. I did not yet add the BFC macro, I think I will add this for (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 167.dat Technic Liftarm 1x7 decorated (also known as Throwbot leg, or Starwars battle droid arm)
|
|
Another impressive part, Marc. It looks like it needs little edgelines added where the "fins" slope down and meet the outer surface. The two fins that protrude into the outer surface have the lines, but the others don't. Great job! Does stl2dat (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Horse Progress Report
|
|
Because many people have asked, I would like to annouce that the body of the horse is now almost finished. The progress can be monitored from the TTracker: (URL) from the picture I now and then update: (URL) do hope to get enough time this weekend (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts) !
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
