Subject:
|
Re: Challenge/Request for the CAD gurus
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Sat, 10 Nov 2001 20:09:38 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
632 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Jake McKee writes:
> In lugnet.cad, Michael Horvath writes:
> > 4. I had a lot of naive questions like this to ask, then I realized that
> > it's not so hard, and that I really just didn't have sufficient motivation to
> > do it myself
> As do many people how would like to use CAD to do something quick and dirty,
> but entirely cool. I don't think that newbie questions equate to naive
> questions.
Agreed 100%. I'd love to contribute to such a project, as I feel that I
have some skill to pass on.
The biggest hinderance I have to this is twofold:
1. time (well, okay, kinda lame since I'm now unemployed, but still...)
2. thinking back to when I was hitting the learning curve -- how do I
differentiate between the helpful stuff and the fluff?
I think the real biggie up front is #2. Such a project needs direction, and
who better to provide the direction than the audience? If you (or anyone
else) would ask the modellers the important questions, using specific models
and/or scenes with specific questions, that would IMHO make it that much
easier for CAD gurus to document how they did what.
Cheers,
- jsproat
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Challenge/Request for the CAD gurus
|
| (...) Um...it's a good thing that no one said that when they were thinking about creating LDraw, or MLCAD, or LEOCad, or the LGEO library, or L3p, or LDAO, or.... (...) I'm not ask for something made for Jake that no one else can use. I am proposing (...) (23 years ago, 10-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
