Subject:
|
Re: Update on Virtual Plans
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Fri, 15 Jan 1999 13:16:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1901 times
|
| |
|
|
On Fri, 15 Jan 1999 07:21:55 GMT, legoverse@geocities.com (Terry K)
wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jan 1999 15:35:35 GMT, blisses@worldnet.att.net (Steve Bliss) wrote:
> > > > > On your FTL ducts, are the red things the much-awaited canoe? If not,
> > > > > what the heck is it?
> > > >
> > > > Bingo! I figured you'd get that one (and no one else would).
> > >
> > > Ah. This wasn't just because I once said I don't care if the canoe
> > > ever gets done in LDraw, is it? Just sticking it in my face and
> > > saying "See! Canoes -can- be used in space" :-)
> >
> > Once? I thought we had a running gag on that one.
>
> Must be a running gag. It sure as hell isn't floating.
Ouch.
> > > I think the trunks would look better. They have that nice flared end
> > > on 'em. The barrels always seem to look too much like, well, barrels.
> >
> > Maybe I could just stuff the canoes full of trans-orange flames, ala
> > Time Cruisers.
> >
> > Wow, that would be hideous.
>
> Hideous? I thought it was hilarious. But please don't do it.
Hideous, hilarious. Is there a difference?
Oh, yeah. Hilarious: "I was sitting around last night, playing with
some different ideas, and I threw this thing together. It's a fast
little space ship. I especially like the racing stripes and flames out
of the exhaust."
Hideous: "I spent months on this thing. The exhaust flames are really
kewl."
> > > Oh yeah, wimp out. Take the techno-babble route. :-)
> >
> > Well, I've already been accused of looking like Star Trek (which I had
> > kinda realized, already). Why not go all the way?
>
> You look like Star Trek? What an enigmatic statement :-)
Yup, that's me. Top-heavy, without direction, and past my prime.
Or maybe it just means that I wander around in a blue velour shirt and
fake pointed ears.
Hmm, this posting seems to be entirely void of LEGO CAD content. What
to do, what to do.
ObLegoCAD: I haven't made a new part-file in weeks.
Ok, it's weak. I'm in a hurry.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Update on Virtual Plans
|
| (...) You defined those terms pretty well. (...) Good one, I had to read that twice before I got it. :-) (...) See "Hideous" above. (...) That's OK. I just received two _large_ loads of parts files. No need to add more. Please. -- Terry K -- (26 years ago, 16-Jan-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Update on Virtual Plans
|
| (...) Must be a running gag. It sure as hell isn't floating. (...) Hideous? I thought it was hilarious. But please don't do it. (...) That is interesting. I will have to try to remember that factoid. (...) You look like Star Trek? What an enigmatic (...) (26 years ago, 15-Jan-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
23 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
