Subject:
|
Re: Questions About Selling Custom Model Instructions: Confirming LEGO/LDraw Consent
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Tue, 26 Aug 2008 21:32:35 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
7603 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Timothy Gould wrote:
> Your examples are not the same process. There's a difference between
> constructing something using software as a tool and constructing something using
> constituent visual components which can be copyrighted. That said, the actual
> design of the parts belongs to LEGO so it all gets quite complex. Thus the
> statement spelling it out.
>
> Tim (also not without a SteerCo hat on)
The difference is you are selling an image of a product and NOT an exact
duplicate of a product. LEGO may have certain trademarks over the specific
design of their bricks, their name, their branding, etc., but they can't stop
anyone from taking a picture (or ldraw rendering or crayon scribble) of
something built from their products. It would still be advisable in commercial
circumstances to include a disclaimer to keep their legal sharks off your back.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
18 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
