To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cadOpen lugnet.cad in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / 15448
15447  |  15449
Subject: 
Re: Questions About Selling Custom Model Instructions: Confirming LEGO/LDraw Consent
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad
Date: 
Fri, 22 Aug 2008 00:10:34 GMT
Viewed: 
13207 times
  
In lugnet.cad, Timothy Gould wrote:
> 
> Your examples are not the same process. There's a difference between
> constructing something using software as a tool and constructing something using
> constituent visual components which can be copyrighted. That said, the actual
> design of the parts belongs to LEGO so it all gets quite complex. Thus the
> statement spelling it out.
> 
> -snip-
> 
> Tim (also not without a SteerCo hat on)

Are you sure you don't mean "...not _with_ a SteerCo hat on" or perhaps
"...without a SteerCo hat on"?

Or is my thinking cap malfunctioning?

Cheers

Richie Dulin
CO Legeaux



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Questions About Selling Custom Model Instructions: Confirming LEGO/LDraw Consent
 
(...) The SteerCo hat was off my head as the space was occupied by the incorrect double negative hat. Tim (18 years ago, 22-Aug-08, to lugnet.cad)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Questions About Selling Custom Model Instructions: Confirming LEGO/LDraw Consent
 
(...) Your examples are not the same process. There's a difference between constructing something using software as a tool and constructing something using constituent visual components which can be copyrighted. That said, the actual design of the (...) (18 years ago, 21-Aug-08, to lugnet.cad)

18 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR