To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cadOpen lugnet.cad in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / 15448
15447  |  15449
Subject: 
Re: Questions About Selling Custom Model Instructions: Confirming LEGO/LDraw Consent
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad
Date: 
Fri, 22 Aug 2008 00:10:34 GMT
Viewed: 
7410 times
  
In lugnet.cad, Timothy Gould wrote:

Your examples are not the same process. There's a difference between
constructing something using software as a tool and constructing something using
constituent visual components which can be copyrighted. That said, the actual
design of the parts belongs to LEGO so it all gets quite complex. Thus the
statement spelling it out.

-snip-

Tim (also not without a SteerCo hat on)

Are you sure you don't mean "...not _with_ a SteerCo hat on" or perhaps
"...without a SteerCo hat on"?

Or is my thinking cap malfunctioning?

Cheers

Richie Dulin
CO Legeaux



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Questions About Selling Custom Model Instructions: Confirming LEGO/LDraw Consent
 
(...) The SteerCo hat was off my head as the space was occupied by the incorrect double negative hat. Tim (16 years ago, 22-Aug-08, to lugnet.cad)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Questions About Selling Custom Model Instructions: Confirming LEGO/LDraw Consent
 
(...) Your examples are not the same process. There's a difference between constructing something using software as a tool and constructing something using constituent visual components which can be copyrighted. That said, the actual design of the (...) (16 years ago, 21-Aug-08, to lugnet.cad)

18 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR