Subject:
|
Re: Questions About Selling Custom Model Instructions: Confirming LEGO/LDraw Consent
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:43:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
7122 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.cad, Jim DeVona wrote:
> In lugnet.cad, Willy Tschager wrote:
> > This is a bit lengthy:
> >
> > http://news.lugnet.com/cad/dev/org/ldraw/?n=3804
> >
> > but all boils down to this final policy:
> >
> > http://www.ldraw.org/files/CAreadme.txt
> >
> > (This version will be shipped with the new CA-Library)
>
> The readme suggests that rendered images are not considered derivative works.
> Since an instruction booklet consists of rendered images, and no LDraw code, I
> conclude that visual instructions are not considered a derivative work.
Since the discussion you linked contained much debate about the derivative
status of rendered images, I'd like to know if anyone wearing a SteerCo hat can
confirm my conclusion.
"Commercial sale of instruction images rendered from LDraw models does not
violate the CA." True or false? Discussion?
Jim
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
18 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|