Subject:
|
Re: Questions About Selling Custom Model Instructions: Confirming LEGO/LDraw Consent
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Fri, 22 Aug 2008 00:24:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
13157 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Richie Dulin wrote:
> In lugnet.cad, Timothy Gould wrote:
> >
> > Your examples are not the same process. There's a difference between
> > constructing something using software as a tool and constructing something using
> > constituent visual components which can be copyrighted. That said, the actual
> > design of the parts belongs to LEGO so it all gets quite complex. Thus the
> > statement spelling it out.
> >
> > -snip-
> >
> > Tim (also not without a SteerCo hat on)
>
> Are you sure you don't mean "...not _with_ a SteerCo hat on" or perhaps
> "...without a SteerCo hat on"?
>
> Or is my thinking cap malfunctioning?
>
> Cheers
>
> Richie Dulin
> CO Legeaux
The SteerCo hat was off my head as the space was occupied by the incorrect
double negative hat.
Tim
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
18 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
