Subject:
|
Re: New primitives?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Wed, 26 Mar 2008 19:18:56 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3954 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Travis Cobbs wrote:
| |
In lugnet.cad, Philippe Hurbain wrote:
First of all, I like the idea of a unit capped cylinder. The stud could then
be changed to a reference to the new primitive. We could use x-ycylc as the
filenames and call the primitive Cylinder Capped. This would be consistent
with the existing 1-4cyls (Cylinder Sloped) primitive.
|
One concern about capped cylinders is that they would lead more multiples of
cylinders - single-capped cylinders, double-capped cylinders, 1/4 capped
cylinders, 2/4 capped cylinders, Hi-res 3/8 double-capped cylinders, etc. etc.
And every single capped cylinder will actually be a compound primitive -- i.e.,
a composition of one or more cylinder, disc, and edge primitives.
While capped cylinders would be useful, I don’t think they would be worth the
overhead.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: New primitives?
|
| (...) I agree with you in all points. But if I see that also you are thinking that capped cylinders are useful maybe there is somebody out who can write a prog for that. I have tried something similar in the past and was not very happy with the (...) (16 years ago, 26-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: New primitives?
|
| (...) First of all, I like the idea of a unit capped cylinder. The stud could then be changed to a reference to the new primitive. We could use x-ycylc as the filenames and call the primitive Cylinder Capped. This would be consistent with the (...) (16 years ago, 26-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
