Subject:
|
Re: New primitives?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Wed, 26 Mar 2008 17:20:53 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4040 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Travis Cobbs wrote:
| |
OK, so I’ll make this primitive, but which way should it face? Should it
face up, like the stud primitive, or should it face down, like the box
primitives?
|
Oh, and should the cap be at Y=0, or should the base be at Y=0? (For reference,
with the stud primitive, the base is at Y=0.)
--Travis
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: New primitives?
|
| (...) I would use the cylinder as model, with the cap at Y=0 on top and an edge at bottom. But I somehow agree with Steve Bliss that it may be overkill if we decline capped cylinder in all angles... Philo (16 years ago, 26-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: New primitives?
|
| (...) OK, so I'll make this primitive, but which way should it face? Should it face up, like the stud primitive, or should it face down, like the box primitives? --Travis (16 years ago, 26-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
