Subject:
|
Re: New primitives?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Wed, 26 Mar 2008 17:10:00 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4262 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Travis Cobbs wrote:
| |
First of all, I like the idea of a unit capped cylinder. The stud could then
be changed to a reference to the new primitive. We could use x-ycylc as the
filenames and call the primitive Cylinder Capped. This would be consistent
with the existing 1-4cyls (Cylinder Sloped) primitive.
|
OK, so I’ll make this primitive, but which way should it face? Should it face
up, like the stud primitive, or should it face down, like the box primitives?
--Travis
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: New primitives?
|
| (...) Oh, and should the cap be at Y=0, or should the base be at Y=0? (For reference, with the stud primitive, the base is at Y=0.) --Travis (17 years ago, 26-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: New primitives?
|
| (...) First of all, I like the idea of a unit capped cylinder. The stud could then be changed to a reference to the new primitive. We could use x-ycylc as the filenames and call the primitive Cylinder Capped. This would be consistent with the (...) (17 years ago, 26-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
