Subject:
|
Re: Renderer Questions
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Wed, 27 Oct 2004 16:32:04 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1112 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Don Heyse wrote:
> In lugnet.cad, Steve Bliss wrote:
> > In lugnet.cad, Don Heyse wrote:
> > > Yuk! I guess it makes sense to add support for ROTSTEP instead.
> >
> > For you it does.
>
> Actually I'm no longer sure about that. If ROTSTEP is supported
> internally in LPUB, and LPUB supports ldglite as an alternative
> renderer, than supporting ROTSTEP in ldglite might make that
> more difficult. Kevin?
>
> I suppose I could make ROTSTEP support optional so folks without
> access to LPUB can still use it.
Beware the slippery slope: buffer exchange, ghost, other issues.....
Kevin
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Renderer Questions
|
| (...) Heh, when I finally realized ROTSTEP was more of a runtime command than an LDLITE parse time command, and looked at the right file, guess what I found. Yeah, that's right: BUFEXCHG, GHOST, etc. test code. I think I might even be able to use (...) (20 years ago, 27-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Renderer Questions
|
| (...) Actually I'm no longer sure about that. If ROTSTEP is supported internally in LPUB, and LPUB supports ldglite as an alternative renderer, than supporting ROTSTEP in ldglite might make that more difficult. Kevin? I suppose I could make ROTSTEP (...) (20 years ago, 27-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
26 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
