Subject:
|
Re: Renderer Questions
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:38:41 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1122 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Don Heyse wrote:
> In lugnet.cad, Steve Bliss wrote:
> > I don't think that's an option Peter can pursue. ;)
>
> Why not? The source for ldlite and ldglite is out there. If anyone
> wants to add ROTSTEP support, I'd be happy to add it to the CVS
> archives.
"can pursue" and "is insane enough to try" are two different issues. I teach
computer programming--I've never claimed to be a GOOD programmer. =)
Peter
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Renderer Questions
|
| (...) LPub's overall architecture suffers horribly from "bottom up design". It started out as a perl script, and then got moved to C++, so that I could add a GUI. It was a 12,000 line monolithic program until about six weeks ago. It is now split up (...) (20 years ago, 27-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Renderer Questions
|
| (...) Actually I'm no longer sure about that. If ROTSTEP is supported internally in LPUB, and LPUB supports ldglite as an alternative renderer, than supporting ROTSTEP in ldglite might make that more difficult. Kevin? I suppose I could make ROTSTEP (...) (20 years ago, 27-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
26 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
