Subject:
|
Re: Renderer Questions
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:27:22 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1103 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Steve Bliss wrote:
> In lugnet.cad, Don Heyse wrote:
> > Yuk! I guess it makes sense to add support for ROTSTEP instead.
>
> For you it does.
Actually I'm no longer sure about that. If ROTSTEP is supported
internally in LPUB, and LPUB supports ldglite as an alternative
renderer, than supporting ROTSTEP in ldglite might make that
more difficult. Kevin?
I suppose I could make ROTSTEP support optional so folks without
access to LPUB can still use it.
> I don't think that's an option Peter can pursue. ;)
Why not? The source for ldlite and ldglite is out there. If anyone
wants to add ROTSTEP support, I'd be happy to add it to the CVS
archives.
Don
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: Renderer Questions
|
| (...) "can pursue" and "is insane enough to try" are two different issues. I teach computer programming--I've never claimed to be a GOOD programmer. =) Peter (20 years ago, 27-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad)
| | | Re: Renderer Questions
|
| (...) If adding ROTSTEP to ldglite is the right thing to do in general, then go ahead and add it. LPub is in general, a simple tool to create a step DAT for each step, and render each step (plus PLI and BOM). There are a bunch of work arounds for (...) (20 years ago, 27-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
26 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
