Subject:
|
Re: Multiple MovedTo Arguments Really Legal?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Wed, 17 Mar 2004 06:22:32 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1015 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Chris Dee wrote:
>
> The full list is :
> 973p11 ~Moved to 973p1a, 973p1b, 973p1c
> 973p15 ~Moved to 973p1d, 973p1e
> 973p35 ~Moved to 973p3n, 973p3q
> 973p37 ~Moved to 973p3r, 973p3s
> 973p4a ~Moved to 973p4n, 973p4q
> 973p65 ~Moved to 973p6b, 973p6c, 973p6d, 973p6e
>
> I'll add these to the PT.
There's also
3846p43.dat ~Moved to 3846p45, 3846p46
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Multiple MovedTo Arguments Really Legal?
|
| (...) Yes, I guess this would work. although I'd prefer to add "(Deprecated)" or something similar to the title. I'm just dismayed that it has taken 7 months for anyone to realise that this causes problems with the toolset. The full list is : 973p11 (...) (21 years ago, 6-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
