Subject:
|
Re: Multiple MovedTo Arguments Really Legal?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Sat, 6 Mar 2004 18:33:01 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1035 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Tore Eriksson wrote:
> In lugnet.cad, Chris Dee wrote:
> > Yes, I guess this would work. although I'd prefer to add "(Deprecated)" or
> > something similar to the title.
> Thanks Chris! I humbly suggest that the words "Moved to" can be changed into
> "Replaced by" to avoid confusion, but I promise I will not be upset if the
> suggestion is turned down.
"~Replaced by" is a good option. "Depecrated" is more meaningful to
computer-language geeks, but I think "~Replaced by" would do the job.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Multiple MovedTo Arguments Really Legal?
|
| (...) I'd like to see us stick with "deprecated" if we possibly can. Even if we have to explain it to E2L speakers, because it has a very precise meaning which is just the meaning we want, I think. (20 years ago, 7-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Multiple MovedTo Arguments Really Legal?
|
| (...) Never heard the word "deprecated" before, but I can guess its meaning from the context. It's fine, "(Obsolete)" could maybe work too, but I don't care that much about the words chosen, long as it doesn't interfer with any tools. (...) Once I (...) (20 years ago, 6-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
