Subject:
|
Re: Multiple MovedTo Arguments Really Legal?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Sun, 7 Mar 2004 07:08:19 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1109 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Steve Bliss wrote:
> In lugnet.cad, Tore Eriksson wrote:
> > In lugnet.cad, Chris Dee wrote:
> > > Yes, I guess this would work. although I'd prefer to add "(Deprecated)" or
> > > something similar to the title.
>
> > Thanks Chris! I humbly suggest that the words "Moved to" can be changed into
> > "Replaced by" to avoid confusion, but I promise I will not be upset if the
> > suggestion is turned down.
>
> "~Replaced by" is a good option. "Depecrated" is more meaningful to
> computer-language geeks, but I think "~Replaced by" would do the job.
I'd like to see us stick with "deprecated" if we possibly can. Even if we have
to explain it to E2L speakers, because it has a very precise meaning which is
just the meaning we want, I think.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
19 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
