Subject:
|
Re: Multiple MovedTo Arguments Really Legal?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Sat, 6 Mar 2004 14:40:30 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
963 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Tore Eriksson wrote:
> > A far better solution had been to keep the 973p11.dat as base part but retitle
> > it to "~Minifig Torso with Dungarees Pattern",
>
> Sorry, skip the rest of the statement. No need to touch the parts with
> hard-coded pattern (p1a, p1b, p1c, and p1j).
>
> The un-orthodox moved to - remark can be altered to a genuine remark statement,
> like this:
>
> 0 ~Minifig Torso with Dungarees Pattern
> 0 Name: 973p11.dat
> 0 Author: Chris Dee <chris_w_dee@hotmail.com>
> 0 (LDRAW_ORG Part UPDATE 2003-02)
> 0 REM Moved to 973p1a, 973p1b, 973p1c
>
> and, of cousre likewise:
>
> 0 ~Minifig Torso with Futuron Pattern
> 0 Name: 973p15.dat
> 0 Author: Chris Dee (chris_w_dee@hotmail.com)
> 0 (LDRAW_ORG Part UPDATE 2003-03)
> 0 REM Moved to 973p1d, 973p1e
>
> ... and so on with 973p35.dat and 973p37.dat. Are there any more?
>
> With these changes, everyone as well as all applications should be happy (I
> hope...)
>
>
> /Tore
Yes, I guess this would work. although I'd prefer to add "(Deprecated)" or
something similar to the title. I'm just dismayed that it has taken 7 months for
anyone to realise that this causes problems with the toolset.
The full list is :
973p11 ~Moved to 973p1a, 973p1b, 973p1c
973p15 ~Moved to 973p1d, 973p1e
973p35 ~Moved to 973p3n, 973p3q
973p37 ~Moved to 973p3r, 973p3s
973p4a ~Moved to 973p4n, 973p4q
973p65 ~Moved to 973p6b, 973p6c, 973p6d, 973p6e
I'll add these to the PT.
Chris
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Multiple MovedTo Arguments Really Legal?
|
| (...) Never heard the word "deprecated" before, but I can guess its meaning from the context. It's fine, "(Obsolete)" could maybe work too, but I don't care that much about the words chosen, long as it doesn't interfer with any tools. (...) Once I (...) (20 years ago, 6-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Multiple MovedTo Arguments Really Legal?
|
| (...) Sorry, skip the rest of the statement. No need to touch the parts with hard-coded pattern (p1a, p1b, p1c, and p1j). The un-orthodox moved to - remark can be altered to a genuine remark statement, like this: 0 ~Minifig Torso with Dungarees (...) (20 years ago, 6-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
