To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cadOpen lugnet.cad in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / 11192
11191  |  11193
Subject: 
Re: Multiple MovedTo Arguments Really Legal?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.mlcad
Date: 
Fri, 5 Mar 2004 21:22:11 GMT
Viewed: 
5084 times
  
In lugnet.cad, Lars C. Hassing wrote:
In lugnet.cad, Tore Eriksson wrote:
In 973p11.dat the first line reads:
0 ~Moved to 973p1a, 973p1b, 973p1c


L3P can obviously handle this correctly, but my utility movedto.exe for one,
treats the input like this:
1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 973p11.dat

is altered to:

1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 973p1a, 973p1b, 973p1c.dat

You are not supposed to actually use the information in the comment,
it's only informational.

When rendering Datsville, you'll recieve several hundreds of "Part n Moved moved
to nn" messages. It is totally necessary to find a way to eliminate them, so I
invented the movedto utility.

The ~ tells mklist to ignore this part.

Yes, that's one of the uses for the "~Moved to..." statement.

Just ignore the line, the following line type 1 will automatically redirect you to the new part.

Ignoring is not an option. There just has to be a way automatically replace
references to renamed files, especially considered the enormous rate of
renaming/renumbering official part. My method worked until this problem popped
up.

Btw, doesn't MLCad also have a feature to replace references to moved files? I
don't use MLCad, but doesn't multiple movedto argument mess things up for MLCad,
too?


/Tore



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Multiple MovedTo Arguments Really Legal?
 
(...) There is: use the file referenced by the type 1 line in the MovedTo file. (...) Yes, MLCad messes this up as well. The problem is that you're using the 0 ~MovedTo comment as a reference instead of the type 1 line in the file. 0 ~MovedTo is a (...) (21 years ago, 5-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.mlcad)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Multiple MovedTo Arguments Really Legal?
 
(...) You are not supposed to actually use the information in the comment, it's only informational. The ~ tells mklist to ignore this part. Just ignore the line, the following line type 1 will automatically redirect you to the new part. /Lars (21 years ago, 5-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad)

19 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR