Subject:
|
Re: Multiple MovedTo Arguments Really Legal?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Sat, 6 Mar 2004 02:57:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2468 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Tore Eriksson wrote:
> In 973p11.dat the first line reads:
> 0 ~Moved to 973p1a, 973p1b, 973p1c
>
> Is there any spec supporting this strange usage?
> Is it really LDraw compatible? Or will original LDraw and other renderers have
> similar problems as my utilities?
Sorry, Tore, but this usage was unavoidable. This isn't a normal part-move, the
migration from 973p11 to 973p1a, 973p1b, and 973p1c is fixing an anomoly in the parts
library. 973p11 is coded so that the undecorated surfaces of the part are a fixed
color, and the patterned areas are variable-colored. The new files are code in the
normal manner -- the patterns are fixed-color, and the part is variable-colored.
At the time 973p11.dat was created, having a variable-colored pattern was considered
useful, because it allowed one part file to model 3 different patterns. However, in
every other case, in LDraw and outside of LDraw (for example, on Peeron), patterns
are treated as fixed-colored. Basically, 973p11.dat is incompatible with other parts
catalogs.
> (Btw, how is it supposed to be interpreted???)
The translation is like this: Look in the model file to see what color is being used
against 973p11.dat. Translate as follows:
black 973p11.dat --> white 973p1a.dat
blue 973p11.dat --> white 973p1b.dat
red 973p11.dat --> white 973p1c.dat
green 973p11.dat --> white 973p1j.dat
other 973p11.dat --> no translation possible
Unfortunately, that requires code in your part-move program to handle 973p11.dat (and
some earlier changes of the same nature, released in the last year or so).
Another thought for rendering datsville: delete all the WRITE lines out of the
moved-to stub files.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Multiple MovedTo Arguments Really Legal?
|
| (...) I do denifinitely no agree at all. (Did anybody expect me to? ;) ) (...) Tell me you are not serious about that. Is that what we are supposed to recommend all MLCad users when they stumble on this issue, as well as I have to recommend it to (...) (23 years ago, 6-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Multiple MovedTo Arguments Really Legal? [DAT]
|
| In 973p11.dat the first line reads: 0 ~Moved to 973p1a, 973p1b, 973p1c L3P can obviously handle this correctly, but my utility movedto.exe for one, treats the input like this: 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 973p11.dat is altered to: 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 (...) (23 years ago, 5-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
