To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cadOpen lugnet.cad in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / 11201
11200  |  11202
Subject: 
Re: Multiple MovedTo Arguments Really Legal?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.mlcad
Date: 
Sat, 6 Mar 2004 13:10:43 GMT
Viewed: 
5286 times
  
Please have a look at my suggestion on how to solve this problem, and let me
know what you think:
http://news.lugnet.com/cad/?n=11200

/Tore



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Multiple MovedTo Arguments Really Legal?
 
"Tore Eriksson" <tore.eriksson@mbox3...wipnet.se> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:Hu5oLv.Eu4@lugnet.com... (...) me (...) But this is just a workarround to avoid any message. It won't solve the problem. I could imagine, doing a repetative check for (...) (20 years ago, 14-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.mlcad)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Multiple MovedTo Arguments Really Legal?
 
(...) It did for me. When MLCad found the refernce to 973p11.dat and asked if I wanted to upgrade, it changed all the "973p11.dat" references to "973p1a,.dat" references. Note the ",". -Orion (20 years ago, 6-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.mlcad)

19 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR