Subject:
|
Re: Multiple MovedTo Arguments Really Legal?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.mlcad
|
Date:
|
Sat, 6 Mar 2004 07:23:14 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5379 times
|
| |
|
|
"Tore Eriksson" <tore.eriksson@mbox325.swipnet.se> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:Hu4JnF.15r3@lugnet.com...
<SNIP>
> >
> > Yes, MLCad messes this up as well. The problem is that you're using the • 0
> > ~MovedTo comment as a reference instead of the type 1 line in the file. • 0
> > ~MovedTo is a comment and not a META command and shouldn't be treated as • such.
> >
> > -Orion
>
> My opinion is that neither MLCad nor MovedTo.exe messes anything up. I • think
> it's the multiple MovedTo arguments that messes everything up, and the • change of
> its usage, be it just a comment or not. And not to mention to have • rendering
> code in a MovedTo file! It should be illegal. :)
MLCad does not mess it up, but doesn't detect more levels yet. Indirectly
you get it done, if you load a model several time until no ~movedto parts
are used anymore :-)
Michael
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Multiple MovedTo Arguments Really Legal?
|
| (...) Sorry, I'm a little bit slow. Exactly how am I supposed to do that with 973p11.dat? And then make this a generic routine for a utility to handle automatically? (...) My opinion is that neither MLCad nor MovedTo.exe messes anything up. I think (...) (21 years ago, 5-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
