 | | Re: 47457 2 x 2 x 2/3 Two Top Studs, Curved Slope End
|
|
(...) I think I'll just create one part of it all. I don't think a primitive nor a sub-part would be necessary. Thanks. (20 years ago, 14-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | OK, I'm torn
|
|
Today I had a first - -Student brings in a set of BI to show what he wants to make for his first project in my 3D AutoCAD class. -It's a Megabloks kit. :( Cool model, though. :) Darrell (20 years ago, 14-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.build.arch, lugnet.build.microscale, lugnet.edu, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 47457 2 x 2 x 2/3 Two Top Studs, Curved Slope End
|
|
(...) Are there many parts that will need this surface? It doesn't seem like it would be that common... If it would help you to have a subfile, then create a subpart file rather than a primitive. If I've totally missed the point of your question, (...) (20 years ago, 13-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Question on part naming
|
|
(...) If you look at what group this is (and the group charter), you'll see that my question applies only to the LDraw parts library, and not to any official LEGO naming convention. I'm looking for an official LDraw answer. As it happens, I am an (...) (20 years ago, 13-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Question on part naming
|
|
(...) [snip] (...) Since the dimensions matter with wedges -- a 3x4 wedge is going to be a different shape from a 4x3 wedge -- the order of dimensions in wedge names should be fixed by axis, not given in "smaller x larger" order. For slope bricks, (...) (20 years ago, 13-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Click-Rotation Parts
|
|
(...) Hello, I've made a common primitive for the click rotation socket parts. See (URL) of them share only the inner cogwheel. So I made a quarter of them. See (URL) I need a name (title) and a partname for that. Please make suggestions. So it's (...) (20 years ago, 13-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Question on part naming
|
|
(...) I was just surfing lego.com and came across the new tutorials. In one of the pages, a similar although much simpler question than yours was asked and answered. (URL) almost wanted to port you question for the experts at lego.com to answer. (...) (20 years ago, 13-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Question on part naming
|
|
I noticed some inconsistancy in the naming of some of the wedge parts. Some are named with the smaller number first, and others are named with the numbers placed to match the numbers used on bricks based on the X and Z axes. For example, 41765 is (...) (20 years ago, 12-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: l3p -check without using l3p
|
|
Thanks guys, I believed there had to be some kind of easy fix to the problem (too stupid). Now I feel a lot more comfortable certifying parts! -NB (20 years ago, 12-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: l3p -check without using l3p
|
|
(...) Actually LDDP has a built in, full l3p check. You have to turn on the co-planarity checks under Tools->Options->Configuration Values -Orion (20 years ago, 12-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: l3p -check without using l3p
|
|
(...) LDAO can be used to run l3p -check without even seeing a command prompt ;) ROSCO (20 years ago, 11-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| |
| | l3p -check without using l3p
|
|
Just a quick question: Is there any programs that can give you a full l3p-check other than l3p? (I not old enough to have done anything but starting games from prompt ;-) ) It seems like LDDP is pretty close to do that but although it’s able to find (...) (20 years ago, 11-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| |
| | Problems with lgeo and trans green
|
|
Here’s two problems that have been bothering me almost ever since I started raytracing, but now I simply have to have them fixed to get on with my webpage: First one: When I use L3PAO with the Lgeo library turned on (-lgeo –o) the resulting Pov-ray (...) (20 years ago, 11-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.ray, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: My Latest Favorite Brickshelf Folder
|
|
(...) (URL) Nope>. (20 years ago, 11-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.models, lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: My Latest Favorite Brickshelf Folder
|
|
(...) I was hoping that you'd somehow be able to get permission from TLC to use their logo-- it really makes the set image complete. I really think your work could be used as a valuable asset to the AFOL community and to TLC as well for that matter. (...) (20 years ago, 11-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.models, lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: My Latest Favorite Brickshelf Folder
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.models, David Laswell wrote: In this and/or similar cases, (...) they'd just send a request to Brickshelf (i.e. Kevin, since they (...) contacting individuals through their Brickshelf accounts) to (...) the problem would sort (...) (20 years ago, 11-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.models, lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Postscript output
|
|
(...) Has anyone gone anywhere with this? -Tim (20 years ago, 11-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Bow-tie quads in BFC-certified parts
|
|
(...) I've seen them in one official part, and one part on the tracker. But since I haven't really been looking for them, I'm guessing they exists in other parts. The main culprit appears to be pre-existing parts that were later BFC-certified. (Both (...) (20 years ago, 10-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Bow-tie quads in BFC-certified parts
|
|
(...) How often do you find bow-tied parts in BFC CERTIFY'd parts? I meant that's a real error that shouldn't be allowed by the parts tracker isn't it? Is there a rule that can be added to the checks done on the files that are submitted that will (...) (20 years ago, 10-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | 47468 2 x 1.5 x 2/3 Sloped and Curved with Flair
|
|
Peeron does not have this in inventory. It's found as a leg or arm armour on all the good knights in Knights Kingdom. How do I ask Peeron to include this part in their inventory? This is going to be a fun part to author! (20 years ago, 10-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
