To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cadOpen lugnet.cad in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / *19955 (-20)
  Re: 32180 Tyre 56 x 30 R (Balloon Tyre for 6595 Wheel 49.6 x 28 VR)
 
WOW! At this rate you will have completed all of the technic types and hubs before too long :) have you done the power puller hub yet? (23 years ago, 17-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: New Render -LMKWYT : )
 
(...) Me like! Me like! Me like! :D I wondered if anybody noticed I posted alot of the ship DAT files on my brickshelf account ;-). Now I know they were put to good use. I need a compuer that can handle all those objects in POV-RAY now. Again, I say (...) (23 years ago, 17-Aug-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad)
 
  Another house for datville?
 
I was think can anyone make me a house? but not any house a IRISH style house not inglish or north Ireland. I'm talking about a house like the ones in Dublin. The main reason is because my mom is Irish and I like the way the houses look and the way (...) (23 years ago, 17-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: BFC revisited
 
(...) I would appreciate that. -Gary (23 years ago, 17-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Getting started: On Linux
 
Great. I will have to take a look, because I still did not succeed to get things running on Linux :-( (...) (23 years ago, 17-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  32180 Tyre 56 x 30 R (Balloon Tyre for 6595 Wheel 49.6 x 28 VR)  [DAT]
 
0 FILE 32180.dat 0 Tyre 56 x 30 R 0 Name: 32180.dat 0 Author: Marc Klein 0 Unofficial Part 1 16 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 -1 0 0 s/32180s.dat 1 16 0 0 0 0 0.382683 0.92388 0 0.92388 -0.382683 -1 0 0 s/32180s.dat 1 16 0 0 0 0 0.707107 0.707107 0 0.707107 (...) (23 years ago, 17-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: Getting started: On Linux
 
Fredrik: (...) Yes. It was just slightly confusing for me to get it to work with non-wrapped lines. Does it look better now. (...) I think it is whatever mood Tim is in, that decides, but Tim will have to answer that himself. Play well, Jacob -- (...) (23 years ago, 17-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: Getting started: On Linux
 
(...) to be done to get started with LDrawing. Just one comment on the URLs: They appear to be line wrapped, e.g. in Step 1: user$ wget (URL) linux-ldraw-library.tar.gz Wouldn't this be somewhat confusing for the user? There's also a similar example (...) (23 years ago, 17-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: Rendering Datsville with POV-Ray
 
(...) I will - when I have figured it out myself! :o/ (...) Animations of Datsville is currently my overall objective with my all parallell LCad projects, and what keeps my going on! Didn't think of time-lapse, but that's a lovely idea! /Tore (23 years ago, 17-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: idea for next version, include ttore boxes
 
First: ttore.dat is a model of my parents' house, included in Datsville. ttore.box is the boundary box file for that very model. Just wanted to clarify. I have made some files like 3001.box, 3002.box etc. (Still missing some, like Plate 1 x 6.) With (...) (23 years ago, 17-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
 
  Getting started: On Linux
 
I have updated my installation guide for getting started drawing and viewing building instructions on Linux: (URL) has created a similar - somewhat more extensive - page for Windows users, and a MacOS specific page should also be on its way. Have a (...) (23 years ago, 17-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)  
 
  Re: Rendering Datsville with POV-Ray
 
Tore, if you could create a tutorial while you're working on it on "How to Build Datsville", it might make a good addition to the reference section of ldraw.org. Anyway, it would give some information for people to chew on. Slap some screenshots on (...) (23 years ago, 17-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: Rendering Datsville with POV-Ray
 
(...) Yeah, but in the model creation process, no real time would be lost. If an automaitic utility were created to aid in the building process that would, say, ask for the requested element size, you could make a ttore brick that's 15 x 15 x 1, or (...) (23 years ago, 17-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: Rendering Datsville with POV-Ray
 
(...) That sounds very clever to me! (...) Sorry for being unclear, I just meant that the name of the part should be "brick", "plate" or "tile", with some size spesification afterwards, but nothing more. If the name includes anything besides the (...) (23 years ago, 17-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: Rendering Datsville with POV-Ray
 
(...) I didn't realize that simplifying could be so complicated. :o) I have already made a program that suggests all bricks, plates, and tiles to be replaced. Before it performs the replacing, the user has the chance to deselect those parts that (...) (23 years ago, 17-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad)
 
  idea for next version, include ttore boxes
 
Michael, if in next version of MLCad you could include support for ttore.box's, one would be able to make render-smart models without having to waste time by going back and "optimizing" the same model model you just built. A new menu item like "New (...) (23 years ago, 17-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
 
  Re: Datsville Overview Map (Was: Boundary Box Utility)
 
(...) I think realtime rendering qualifies as above statement (23 years ago, 17-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: BFC revisited
 
I have printed the bfcspec file for review. Hopefully I will get a response back to you. I have been using BFC in most all my new parts for the last six months or so. Please send me the BFC compliant primitives, so that I can be sure I am using them (...) (23 years ago, 17-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: BFC revisited
 
I forgot to mention: if anyone is interested in looking at the most-recent version of the BFC proposal, it's still at: (URL). The first screen of text is meta-comments about the status of the proposal. The actual proposal starts at the line "LDraw (...) (23 years ago, 17-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: BFC revisited
 
There was never agreement on what the BFC standard should be. So there aren't very many parts that follow it in any way. I do have a set of primitives that are BFC-compliant. I didn't straighten out all the primitives, but I did a number of them. I (...) (23 years ago, 17-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR