Subject:
|
Re: BFC revisited
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 17 Aug 2001 02:48:21 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
419 times
|
| |
|
|
There was never agreement on what the BFC standard should be. So there
aren't very many parts that follow it in any way.
I do have a set of primitives that are BFC-compliant. I didn't straighten
out all the primitives, but I did a number of them. I can email them to
you, if you want.
Steve
In lugnet.cad.dev, Gary Williams writes:
> I'm looking for a model file that utilizes BFC-certified parts to test
> backface culling in the CAD application I'm developing.
>
> Unfortunately, as near as I can tell, only 13 part files have a BFC-related
> comment, and on top of that, they're not consistently formatted:
>
> 30134 (0 BFC CERTIFY CW)
> 30156 (0 BFC NOCERTIFY)
> 30183 (0 BFC CERTIFY CW)
> 4107073 (0 CERTIFY BFC CW)
> 4107488 (0 CERTIFY BFC CW)
> 4107539 (0 CERTIFY BFC CW)
> 4150p01 (0 BFC CERTIFY CW)
> 4523 (0 BFC NOCERTIFY)
> 553 (0 BFC CERTIFY CW)
> 73593 (0 CERTIFY BFC CW)
> 9044 (0 CERTIFY BFC CW)
> 9567 (0 CERTIFY BFC CW)
> 553s01 (0 BFC CERTIFY CW)
>
> I had hoped that by now, at least the basic bricks would be BFC compliant,
> since they are used more often than any other parts.
>
> It would be neat if we could develop a standard set of DAT files for testing
> Lego renderers. These would be akin to the famous teapot model that was
> used for the first general-purpose renderer.
>
> -Gary
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: BFC revisited
|
| I forgot to mention: if anyone is interested in looking at the most-recent version of the BFC proposal, it's still at: (URL). The first screen of text is meta-comments about the status of the proposal. The actual proposal starts at the line "LDraw (...) (23 years ago, 17-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | BFC revisited
|
| I'm looking for a model file that utilizes BFC-certified parts to test backface culling in the CAD application I'm developing. Unfortunately, as near as I can tell, only 13 part files have a BFC-related comment, and on top of that, they're not (...) (23 years ago, 16-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
