Subject:
|
Re: BFC revisited
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Sun, 19 Aug 2001 01:37:39 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
296 times
|
| |
|
|
Gary Williams wrote...
> I'm looking for a model file that utilizes BFC-certified parts to test
> backface culling in the CAD application I'm developing.
>
> Unfortunately, as near as I can tell, only 13 part files have a BFC-related
> comment, and on top of that, they're not consistently formatted:
>
> 30134 (0 BFC CERTIFY CW)
> 30156 (0 BFC NOCERTIFY)
> 30183 (0 BFC CERTIFY CW)
> 4107073 (0 CERTIFY BFC CW)
> 4107488 (0 CERTIFY BFC CW)
> 4107539 (0 CERTIFY BFC CW)
> 4150p01 (0 BFC CERTIFY CW)
> 4523 (0 BFC NOCERTIFY)
> 553 (0 BFC CERTIFY CW)
> 73593 (0 CERTIFY BFC CW)
> 9044 (0 CERTIFY BFC CW)
> 9567 (0 CERTIFY BFC CW)
> 553s01 (0 BFC CERTIFY CW)
Steve, please note that Gary pointed out that some parts are badly formatted...
"l3p -check" doesn't complain, as "0 CERTIFY BFC CW" is a perfectly legal comment :-)
I don't think l3p easily can be made to check this,
"0 This part uses BFC" should not give a warning.
Checking only comments with solely BFC keywords would not catch
"0 CERTIFY BFC CV"
/Lars
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | BFC revisited
|
| I'm looking for a model file that utilizes BFC-certified parts to test backface culling in the CAD application I'm developing. Unfortunately, as near as I can tell, only 13 part files have a BFC-related comment, and on top of that, they're not (...) (23 years ago, 16-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
