To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 6369
6368  |  6370
Subject: 
Re: BFC revisited
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Fri, 17 Aug 2001 17:45:22 GMT
Viewed: 
422 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dev, Paul Easter writes:
I have printed the bfcspec file for review. Hopefully I will get a response
back to you.

Cool!

I have been using BFC in most all my new parts for the last six months or so.
Please send me the BFC compliant primitives, so that I can be sure I am
using them correctly.

will do.

Correct me if I am wrong.  We cannot make the sloping cylinder primitves bfc
compliant since they can not be made to work on all orientations. (Except
for making a new set of them and updating all the parts that use them.)

I'm not understanding the problem.  I've made versions of the sloping
cylinders that are bfc-compliant.

Can reverse winding be used to correct this problem?

Do you mean the problem (not just with sloped cylinders) that sometimes
primitives are used for the outside surface, and sometimes for the inside
surface?  Like the two 4-4cyli.dats in stud2.dat?

That is a real issue, and fixing it will involve updating the part files,
because one way or another, the part file has to indicate which way it's
using the primitives.

There have been two workable suggestions for dealing with this problem.
They are:

1. Make a second set of primitives, with an inside-out orientation.  Using
these files will require all part files to be updated to point to the new
primitives.

2. Use a new metastatement to flag when a primitive is being used 'inside
out'.  This approach will require all part files to be updated with these
new metastatements.

The BFC proposal uses approach #2.  Technically, there's no clear advantage
to either approach.  Maintenance-wise, I think approach #2 is better.

Steve



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: BFC revisited
 
I have printed the bfcspec file for review. Hopefully I will get a response back to you. I have been using BFC in most all my new parts for the last six months or so. Please send me the BFC compliant primitives, so that I can be sure I am using them (...) (23 years ago, 17-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)

8 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR