Subject:
|
Re: BFC revisited
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Mon, 20 Aug 2001 16:04:53 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
730 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Gary Williams writes:
> Steve Bliss wrote:
> > There was never agreement on what the BFC standard should be. So there
> > aren't very many parts that follow it in any way.
> >
> > I do have a set of primitives that are BFC-compliant. I didn't straighten
> > out all the primitives, but I did a number of them. I can email them to
> > you, if you want.
>
> I would appreciate that.
I double-checked the primitives I had, to make sure they were OK. I zipped
them up, and posted them on my Geocities site. You can grab a copy from
<http://www.geocities.com/partsref/bfc/index.html>.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
