 | | Re: Parts Cataloging Program
|
|
(...) Is there some other way to compress JPG files, besides lowering the quality? Whenever I save a JPG file with 100% accuracy, the saved file is huge (ie, about the same size as a similar BMP file). (...) I've never heard of any kind of (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Throwbot foot
|
|
(...) Marc, Fredrik's post prompted me to look more closely at this part. I noticed that there are references to any of the axle primitives. Is there a reason you did not use any of these primitive files in your file? Steve (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Gonna build a mountain in my living room.
|
|
(...) I was planning on making mine about 8 studs wide. I think that I can do it, even though I wasn't so sure earlier, but you reinspired me. I have been able to create doors that fold up, and don't look to bad, and wheels that fold down. (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: L3PLiTE?
|
|
Leonardo Zide <leonardo@centroin.com.br> wrote in message news:38DFDCB4.594866....com.br... (...) So what test do you run to determine what studs get removed? -John Van (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Throwbot foot
|
|
To me, the axle sticking out from the centre of the foot appears to have a little bit too thin cross sections. This observation is only based on viewing the part in L3Lab, so it may be wrong. What do you think? Other than that, it looks good! (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 32165 Technic Throwbot Head
|
|
Wow! What a part! Great work! If there is one thing I can nitpick about, it would be the lower "partial" axle hole. The real part has two small "nibs" on the lower portion, which are used to hold an axle in place. You can hear a "click" sound if (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 6641.dat Technic Changeover Catch
|
|
This part certainly looks very good! I'm a bit unsure about it's orientation, though. Perhaps it could benefit from having the same orientation and origin as "32039 Technic Connector with Axlehole" and "3651 Technic Connector"? The part does have (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 6539.dat Technic Driving Ring
|
|
The part does not appear to have the "clip" detail which is seen in the centre of the real part. But the part still looks great, so I would definitively vote for it in the LCAD update. Great work! I also agree with your choice of orientation. (I (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | 6539.dat Technic Driving Ring [DAT]
|
|
0 Technic Driving Ring 0 Name: 6539.dat 0 Author: Marc Klein 0 Created with stl2dat conversion tool 0 Un-Official LCad part 1 16 0 0 9 20 0 0 0 0 20 0 -4 0 4-4cyli.dat 1 16 0 0 9 20 0 0 0 0 20 0 -1 0 4-4edge.dat 1 16 0 0 5 20 0 0 0 0 20 0 -1 0 (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: L3PLiTE?
|
|
(...) I have done something like that for LeoCAD, it removes the studs above and below the bricks and plates for the rendering. I haven't added this option for the POV-Ray export but that's something that I can do if you want. Leonardo (25 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Cataloging Program
|
|
(...) JPG is NOT lossy, i.e. it's NOT required to be lossy, it can be defined to be 100% accurate ! (...) Actually I think that the best format is the GIF format, due to the type of compressing it uses and our specific renderer used for the (...) (25 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: L3PLiTE?
|
|
(...) Argh! Didn't think of that... :o/ /Tore (25 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDRAW models and pictures
|
|
(...) Of course! Here it is: plane { z,0 pigment { image_map { sys "bushes.bmp" } scale <300,300,1> } normal { bump_map { sys "bushes.bmp" bump_size 10} scale <300,300,1> } finish { ambient 0.2 diffuse 0.2 } rotate <90,0,0> translate <0,140,0> } I (...) (25 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: 6631.dat Technic Changeover Plate
|
|
Marc Klein <marckl@easynet.fr> wrote in message news:38de6aa6.717081...net.com... (...) Looks great! -John Van (25 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New part : Minifig Torso with Patch Pocket Pattern
|
|
Chris Dee <chris_w_dee@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:Fry8p1.1MF@lugnet.com... (...) Very nice. I noticed something interesting when viewing this part. The shading in L3Lab and LDLite is not applied to edgelines, so the white edgelines in the (...) (25 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: new part - 71014 Castle Greatsword
|
|
Franklin W. Cain <fwcain@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:FrxKs8.IGz@lugnet.com... (...) Franklin, Thanks for your committment to creating quality parts! I predict you will become a true part artist! -John Van (25 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: L3PLiTE?
|
|
Tore Eriksson <tore.eriksson@mbox3...wipnet.se> wrote in message news:38DE84F4.380C9D...pnet.se... (...) only those standard bricks, plates, and tiles (...) could be a way to free up some resources for (...) somehow, and I don't know exactly how (...) (25 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Big shock absorber
|
|
Hi I've send a message past few weeks about large shock absorber. Someone answer me that this part was still on work, because of the variable length of this part. But unfortunately, i don't find this message. I only remember it was possible to send (...) (25 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Gonna build a mountain in my living room.
|
|
(...) I was planning on making mine for Minifigs, but I gave up because I could'nt build it right. It started looking like a truck and things only got worse from there. The hardest part that I could not figure out was how to fold the wheels under (...) (25 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: L3PLiTE?
|
|
(...) colour < 47) ), interior can be skipped. Of course you mean above the lower edge relative to the parts current orientation. That would require taking the transformation matrix into account. -Chuck (25 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
