 | | Re: Minifigs
|
|
(...) Have you installed the complete LDraw package? Without it, you won't get much of anything. (URL) After you get that installed, most programs should go. I don't know of too many custom, un-official minifig parts. Unofficial parts are not (...) (25 years ago, 10-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Part 3736.dat Technic Large Pulley
|
|
(...) The part 3736sp.dat is at the end of the message. Should I have posted it in two seperate messages ? Marc Klein A Mindstorms fan. (25 years ago, 10-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifigs
|
|
I've posted a zip of these figs at (URL) . Alan Random set: <set:6035> (25 years ago, 10-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw CD-ROM Project
|
|
I too would pay $10 to $20 for the disk, If just to support the cause. I really appreciate that I got so many quality tools for free in the first place. -Chuck (25 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | .datFest Update
|
|
Greetings Just thought I'd give a little update on 'progress' on .datFest. In reality, there hasn't been any. The last place I talked to for sponsorship/hosting was the Boston Museum of Science. The good news is they said they would look into it, (...) (25 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad.datfest, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MPD spec
|
|
Rui: (...) I do use it for "batch processing". (...) That's while I added the "NOFILE" meta-command at some point. I think it was Jeremy who made me aware of the need for that. (...) I think you could say so. I wrote the definition and the first (...) (25 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Lich (Undead Wizard) [DAT]
|
|
I've been doodling with castle stuff lately. This is the MPD I used to create the image that I posted here: "(URL) FILE lich2.dat 0 MPD Author: Franklin W. Cain 0 0 This .MPD was compiled using M-Peedy 0 (URL) Lich (an Undead Wizard) 0 Unofficial (...) (25 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: MPD spec
|
|
(...) So are you available to help define a better/improved Multi Part Dat format, not necessarilly with MPD extension ? By using your experience with the current MPD format ? including the splitter and Builder ! What would you improve ? Do you (...) (25 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifigs
|
|
Hmm...MLCAD lists them under "minifig". Have you made sure you downloaded the "complete.exe" file with all the parts? (I don't mean to sound condescending here, just trying to cover all the bases.) Ben Vaughan ---...--- This space reserved for a new (...) (25 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifigs
|
|
Hmm... true enough. I hadn't really given it much thought. All the same, for those starting out, (even those of us that aren't 8) ), LDraw and MLCAD offer a fairly simple solution. Making such an absolute statement sure was a goof on my part though. (...) (25 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: User POV substitutions in L3P
|
|
(...) I have had a change of heart. For those desparate to see whats going on, I have provided a sample kit. please note that the commands might change if Lars integrates it with L3P. I have provided source code, executable, two before and after (...) (25 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: User POV substitutions in L3P
|
|
(...) Since I have already provided the source to Lars, I assume that he would like to add the code directly to L3P. He also knows how to deal with the issues I was unable to fix dealing with where L3P inserts the comment fields. For now, I will not (...) (25 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: User POV substitutions in L3P
|
|
(...) Hm, he uses a special "rugged" texture on the slopes, to give them the correct look. (This can be done in L3P too, with some manual adjustments to the POV file.) Also, he seems to have two definitions for each part, one transparent and one (...) (25 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: User POV substitutions in L3P
|
|
Chuck Sommerville skrev i meddelandet ... (...) There sure is! When can we have it? <g> -- Anders Isaksson, Sweden BlockCAD: (2 URLs) (25 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Part 3736.dat Technic Large Pulley
|
|
Its got a reference to 3736sp.dat, and there is a chunk of the part which is floating way behind the part. -John Van Marc Klein <marckl@easynet.fr> wrote in message news:7glecsgvec9alji...4ax.com... (...) repost. (...) (25 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: MPD spec
|
|
(...) I believe the answer would be Yes and Yes. Steve (25 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: User POV substitutions in L3P
|
|
Fredrik Glöckner wrote... (...) No, the mathematics is easy, just a simple matrix in POV. But Lutz mentioned something about a special index file and flags for transparent parts and slopes. And I can see LeoCAD's code to read the file. But I would (...) (25 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: User POV substitutions in L3P
|
|
(...) I'ts not too difficult to incorporate LGEO and L3P in the same POV file. I've done it once to get a high level of details in a wallpaper rendering: (URL) was surprised that noone mentioned this.) What you basically need to do to cram LGEO (...) (25 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: User POV substitutions in L3P
|
|
Chuck Sommerville wrote... (...) Good idea, I have thought of it myself too :-) But I have postponed the implementation because I was hoping for an integration of LGEO and L3P: the effort writing POV replacements for LDraw parts naturally belongs in (...) (25 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: User POV substitutions in L3P
|
|
George GeoMan wrote... (...) The good thing about L3P: it is INDEPENDENT of part updates. The not so good thing about L3P: some rounded parts look egdy/angular. /Lars (25 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
