To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.buildOpen lugnet.build in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Building / 15000
14999  |  15001
Subject: 
Re: wishin' on a star
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.build
Date: 
Wed, 7 Jul 2004 22:05:51 GMT
Viewed: 
1079 times
  
In lugnet.build, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
   In lugnet.build, David Laswell wrote:
   In lugnet.build, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
   In lugnet.build, David Laswell wrote:
   The stud notches pretty much peg it as a 2x2.

or something that fits on top of a 1x1 tile, if the scale is unclear.

You’re thinking too hard and not looking at all of the evidence.

I’d say, given that you posted such a detailed analysis of all the parts, with a running point by point commentary, that you’re the one thinking too hard, but that’s just me.

I think a better approach than analysing in depth is to just ask the originator what she had in mind. Which is what I was doing and having a good time with, actually.
that was the point of the original post - entertainment.

  
   It’s the only part in the entire list that’s upside-down, so there must be something significant to the bottom. You can also see the stud on the top peeking out, which is way undersized for something that’s designed to fit down over a 1x1 tile and lock on with those notches. Most importantly, why would someone want a dome top that can only clips over a 1x1 tile, plate, or brick?

It’s not my wishlist, nor is it necessarily billed as a generic one, it’s a particular person’s wishlist. So I couldn’t say why, not being that person.

But who cares? I merely asked questions (to show my interest
much appreciated

   and to give positive feedback
again much appreciated

   because I think she did a neat thing) without a rush to judgement about what sorts of parts are “good” and what sort aren’t.
judgement is what human nature’s all about. just content that someone looked at the pieces and got out of them what he/she needed/wanted.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: wishin' on a star
 
(...) I'd say, given that you posted such a detailed analysis of all the parts, with a running point by point commentary, that you're the one thinking too hard, but that's just me. I think a better approach than analysing in depth is to just ask the (...) (20 years ago, 7-Jul-04, to lugnet.build, FTX)

15 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR