Subject:
|
Re: wishin' on a star
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.build
|
Date:
|
Wed, 7 Jul 2004 21:52:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1067 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.build, David Laswell wrote:
|
In lugnet.build, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
|
In lugnet.build, David Laswell wrote:
|
The stud notches pretty much peg it as a 2x2.
|
or something that fits on top of a 1x1 tile, if the scale is unclear.
|
Youre thinking too hard and not looking at all of the evidence.
|
Id say, given that you posted such a detailed analysis of all the parts, with a
running point by point commentary, that youre the one thinking too hard, but
thats just me.
I think a better approach than analysing in depth is to just ask the originator
what she had in mind. Which is what I was doing and having a good time with,
actually.
|
Its the
only part in the entire list thats upside-down, so there must be something
significant to the bottom. You can also see the stud on the top peeking out,
which is way undersized for something thats designed to fit down over a 1x1
tile and lock on with those notches. Most importantly, why would someone
want a dome top that can only clips over a 1x1 tile, plate, or brick?
|
Its not my wishlist, nor is it necessarily billed as a generic one, its a
particular persons wishlist. So I couldnt say why, not being that person.
But who cares? I merely asked questions (to show my interest and to give
positive feedback because I think she did a neat thing) without a rush to
judgement about what sorts of parts are good and what sort arent.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies: | | Re: wishin' on a star
|
| (...) that was the point of the original post - entertainment. (...) much appreciated (...) again much appreciated (...) judgement is what human nature's all about. just content that someone looked at the pieces and got out of them what he/she (...) (20 years ago, 7-Jul-04, to lugnet.build, FTX)
| | | Re: wishin' on a star
|
| (...) Not at all. Well, maybe with my second guess on #13, but that's a matter of the evidence (i.e. the original mlcad plate that it was modified from) being flawed. For everything else I clearly thought just hard enough, since I pegged them all. (...) (20 years ago, 7-Jul-04, to lugnet.build, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: wishin' on a star
|
| (...) You're thinking too hard and not looking at all of the evidence. It's the only part in the entire list that's upside-down, so there must be something significant to the bottom. You can also see the stud on the top peeking out, which is way (...) (20 years ago, 7-Jul-04, to lugnet.build, FTX)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|