Subject:
|
Re: wishin' on a star
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.build
|
Date:
|
Wed, 7 Jul 2004 20:43:59 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1024 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.build, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
| |
In lugnet.build, David Laswell wrote:
| |
The stud notches pretty much peg it as a 2x2.
|
or something that fits on top of a 1x1 tile, if the scale is unclear.
|
You’re thinking too hard and not looking at all of the evidence. It’s the only
part in the entire list that’s upside-down, so there must be something
significant to the bottom. You can also see the stud on the top peeking out,
which is way undersized for something that’s designed to fit down over a 1x1
tile and lock on with those notches. Most importantly, why would someone want a
dome top that can only clips over a 1x1 tile, plate, or brick? That’s the
sort of use-restricted part that everyone would complain about if TLC produced
it, especially since the closest we have to a true 1x1 dome is the control stick
base.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: wishin' on a star
|
| (...) I'd say, given that you posted such a detailed analysis of all the parts, with a running point by point commentary, that you're the one thinking too hard, but that's just me. I think a better approach than analysing in depth is to just ask the (...) (20 years ago, 7-Jul-04, to lugnet.build, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
