Subject:
|
Re: wishin' on a star
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.build
|
Date:
|
Wed, 7 Jul 2004 19:31:47 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
954 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.build, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
| |
Ah, OK. So is it only 1 stud around or is it a 2x2?
|
The stud notches pretty much peg it as a 2x2.
| |
The view you chose didn’t make that clear. For a couple of these parts
showing them in use with another part, or showing several angles, might
clarify the usages.
|
I was able to figure them all out without any trouble, with only a few
exceptions:
1. Double-ended clip plate (not sure why the other two variants weren’t
included).
4. 1x1 round tile.
6. Short swing-hinge plate (interesting concept, but 1x1 plates can twist a
little, so use of this might be a bit frustrating).
8. Tiles for the underside.
9. Tall headlight brick (I’m not sure what the point of this one is, since a
2-brick height will still leave the side studs slightly wider than 2-stud
spacing, and making it shorter to fix the spacing will leave it about 1-tile
short of 2-brick height).
10. 1x1 log brick (I remember someone lamenting its non-existence a few days
ago).
11. Either a 1x1 version of this part or this part
without the dangly plate (not sure which part inspired it, but it’s essentially
the same destination).
12. Studless 2x2 macaroni brick.
13. At first glance it appears to be a tile version of 3x3 plate w/ round
corner, but the curved edge sticks out a bit too far. I’m guessing it’s
actually a 2x2 tile with a 1-stud radius on the corner (like the 3x3 plate has a
2-stud radius, rather than like the 4x4 plate which has a 4-stud radius). There
are no other parts that I can think of with a matching radius that aren’t
completely round (2x2 round brick, 2x2 round dome, 2x2 cone, etc.), so I’m
really confused as to why this part would even be included in the wish list.
14. Tile for the 2x2 macaroni brick (presumedly an alternative solution to
having #12 made?).
15. Tile version of 3x6 plate without corners.
16. Tile version of 3x3 plate without corner.
17. Hollow version of the R2-D2
head, as compared to this
part, which is not just taller, but also has tapered sides.
18a-e. New flower colors.
19. Either a short version of this part or this part, or a
non-corner version of this
part. Again, I’m not sure which piece inspired
20. 4-wide version of this
(Why just a 4-wide, and not a 2-wide or 1-wide?).
21. This is the one I had the most trouble with. It appears to be a 10 degree
version of this piece, but the
concave side doesn’t look nearly large enough to work. Based on the size of the
45 degree version, and the standard 10 degree slope, it’d have to be 12x12 to
have matching concave/convex slopes.
22. 33 degree faceted triple-slope. This is a partial exception because I can
tell exactly what it is, but not what it’s based on. The closest I could come
up with is this part, but it’s
45/33/45, with a very different overall design.
22a. Just the unique corner section of Part #22.
23. 33 degree version of this
part.
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: wishin' on a star
|
| (...) perhaps i should have enclosed directions to my mocpages (URL) where all of the pieces are named, however the pieces are not visible on the page with the descriptions. (...) probably because i haven't lamented the lack of one yet. i only (...) (20 years ago, 7-Jul-04, to lugnet.build, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: wishin' on a star
|
| (...) As I suspected. Your surgery worked! (...) Ah, OK. So is it only 1 stud around or is it a 2x2? The view you chose didn't make that clear. For a couple of these parts showing them in use with another part, or showing several angles, might (...) (20 years ago, 7-Jul-04, to lugnet.build, FTX)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
