Subject:
|
Re: Group Charters
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.terms
|
Date:
|
Wed, 3 May 2000 22:34:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5962 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.terms, Richard Franks writes:
> Actually, I'm not sure if allowing .loc hierarchies to allow/disallow certain
> types of .market posts will effect .loc.us that much - most of the market.*
> traffic is probably American anyway :)
Oh, dear. Of course they will - that is, if we ALLOW certain market posts in
ALL of .loc.us there will be a HUGE amount of market posts. Personally, I
think that market posts should be allowed in lower-level .loc groups
(eg, .loc.us.ma, or .loc.us.ca) but not in the high level group (.loc.us
specifically).
FTR, I definitely think that loc groups should have the choice of allowing
market posts, especially in non-US groups; I also think it should be possible
to have market posts in .loc.us.*, even a very good idea to do so if the
people using the group reach a consensus. BUT I think there will be too much
irrelevant market traffic (aka noise) if it is allowed in "lugnet.loc.us".
-Shiri
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Group Charters
|
| (...) In practice - the unofficial rule-change in .loc.uk allowing some .market posts through concensous, has been quite easy to remember for me - essentially because I've been a part of that group. If you have nothing to do with a locality, then (...) (25 years ago, 3-May-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
