 | | Re: Top stories threshold
|
| (...) I think the Top Stories function works on just evaluating the Top 10 spotlighted posts. If no one spotlights anything, then a post where the author spotlights himself could make it to the Top Stories page. It might be a good idea to make it so (...) (22 years ago, 21-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| | | | | Top stories threshold
|
| Please consider adjusting the spotlight threshold for including posts in the top stories list. It seems to me with such a large membership (and growing fast), that the current threshold is way too low, resulting in more stories making it to the list (...) (22 years ago, 21-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| | | | | Modify 'Top Stories' home page to honor filter
|
| With all of these new topics appearing, I've started to add tweak my filtering settings ((URL) Unfortunately, I need for the home page to honor these settings. I should not see 'top stories' for groups that I have filtered specifically out. Is this (...) (22 years ago, 21-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| | | | | Re: spam blocking
|
| (...) I would like to tack on my support for this also. Having the spamblock in the first part of the email addy is just pointless for those of us with our own domain. If there are no plans on fixing this problem can you please let me know so I can (...) (22 years ago, 21-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| | | | | Re: Is LUGNET what you really want? (Was: Re: Lavender Brick Society)
|
| (...) Replying to myself..., and Wayne, again. ;] Wayne upon re-reading my post and your reply, it dawned on me that perhaps you were in fact addressing my question, "Is LUGNET what you really want?", with your view being yes, and to those that it's (...) (22 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.people, lugnet.org)
| | | | | Re: Is LUGNET what you really want? (Was: Re: Lavender Brick Society)
|
| (...) Wayne, I don't know if your question is meant to be rhetorical to the general members, or if it's directly specifically at me. If the latter, then unfortunately it reads like you missed the point of my post (or I failed to make it well). I was (...) (22 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.people, lugnet.org)
| | | | | Re: spam blocking
|
| (...) This is still an issue. Can I please get a ruling from the PTB if this is (A) not a priority or (B) definitely not going to be implemented? Thanks, Amy (22 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| | | | | Re: Is LUGNET what you really want? (Was: Re: Lavender Brick Society)
|
| In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Kyle D. Jackson wrote: <snip> (...) No, what I expected when I joined LUGNET, was part resource, part discussion. .space mostly. I saw it as a place to exchange building ideas and maybe a little banter. But what I got (...) (22 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.people, lugnet.org)
| | | | | Re: Geobra Society
|
| (...) I would support the idea of a Playmobil subgroup. I'm active on both LUGNET and Playmoboard, and I see a distinctive difference between the two communities: LEGO is about building, so LUGNET is dominated by male engineers. LUGNET is American, (...) (22 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| | | | | Re: Louisiana bans gay marriages
|
| (...) So then I suggest moving ALL of the 'people' forums to a sub-forum of off-topic. And be default skip-filtered just like the other non-Lego forums. By your own admission this topic - that has nothing to do with Lego in any way is ok, then it (...) (22 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.people.lgbt, lugnet.admin.suggestions) !
| | | | | Re: Is LUGNET what you really want? (Was: Re: Lavender Brick Society)
|
| (...) LOL at obscure reference to infamous .Space history! (I didn't see your link to that thread until typing this reply, because the HTML link was only applied to the last period you typed.) I've no idea where to FUT this, so I'll leave it (...) (22 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.people, lugnet.org)
| | | | | Re: Geobra Society
|
| (...) I don't think so. Someone wishing that one set of voices be silenced (or that they "shut their ignorant piehole") doesn't mean that it's going to happen. Them saying so gives the community a chance to respond and determine its stance on the (...) (22 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.people, FTX) !
| | | | | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
| (...) Here’s my vote for: fanatical.christian-...zealot.org JAL wrote: “The fifth reason is that homosexuality is NOT a tolerant lifestyle. It is an immoral, hateful, bigoted, sexist, discriminatory, intolerant, deviant, and even racist lifestyle.” (...) (22 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.org)
| | | | | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
| Nope, what I was saying is that your own preconceived biases made you assume that someone asking for a hetero group at this present time was doing so 'to get even/keep up with the homosexual Joneses' rather than it being a legitimate request. You (...) (22 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.people, lugnet.org)
| | | | | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
| In lugnet.people, Jesse Alan Long wrote: (snipping to focus on the "best" parts) (...) When reading this huge thread, I saw many posts that were beyond good taste, many that had no basis in fact, many that made preposterous statements, many that (...) (22 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.org, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
| To quote the masterwork film, Big Trouble in Little China: "Are you crazy? Is that your problem?" I'd like to advocate for a newsgroup, lugnet.people.jessealanlong so that your comedic stylings can be preserved for future generations. Jesse, don't (...) (22 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.org) !
| | | | | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
| Major snippage If this is my last time on here, (...) Wait a second here, are you trying to say that your post makes sense? I can only hope that your poor sentence construction, and seeming logical falacies are actually just translation problems (...) (22 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.org)
| | | | | Re: Is LUGNET what you really want? (Was: Re: Lavender Brick Society)
|
| Hello! (...) It still makes me feel good. It's not what I had expected when I sent the money but that doesn't mean I'm disappointed. I would not want to leave. Where else is it possible to discuss anything and everything with people who you don't (...) (22 years ago, 18-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.people, lugnet.org)
| | | | | Re: Is LUGNET what you really want? (Was: Re: Lavender Brick Society)
|
| (...) Except it'd more likely be lugnet.people.(your country).(your state).(your city).(your street).kyle., just in the unforseen circumstance that there is another Kyle. Don't get me wrong, I reckon lugnet.(incredibly convoluted heirarchy).kyle (...) (22 years ago, 18-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.people, lugnet.org, FTX)
| | | | | Is LUGNET what you really want? (Was: Re: Lavender Brick Society)
|
| (...) Wow, controversy on LUGNET. Will wonders never cease? ;] Damn I'm going to regret this. Oh well, as long as my post is more coherent than JAL's, I've done good. ;] I have formed a theory. Here's a pictorial representation of part of my theory: (...) (22 years ago, 18-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.people, lugnet.org)
|
|
