 | | Re: Is LUGNET what you really want? (Was: Re: Lavender Brick Society)
|
| (...) Wayne, I don't know if your question is meant to be rhetorical to the general members, or if it's directly specifically at me. If the latter, then unfortunately it reads like you missed the point of my post (or I failed to make it well). I was (...) (22 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.people, lugnet.org)
| | | | | Re: spam blocking
|
| (...) This is still an issue. Can I please get a ruling from the PTB if this is (A) not a priority or (B) definitely not going to be implemented? Thanks, Amy (22 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| | | | | Re: Is LUGNET what you really want? (Was: Re: Lavender Brick Society)
|
| In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Kyle D. Jackson wrote: <snip> (...) No, what I expected when I joined LUGNET, was part resource, part discussion. .space mostly. I saw it as a place to exchange building ideas and maybe a little banter. But what I got (...) (22 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.people, lugnet.org)
| | | | | Re: Geobra Society
|
| (...) I would support the idea of a Playmobil subgroup. I'm active on both LUGNET and Playmoboard, and I see a distinctive difference between the two communities: LEGO is about building, so LUGNET is dominated by male engineers. LUGNET is American, (...) (22 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| | | | | Re: Louisiana bans gay marriages
|
| (...) So then I suggest moving ALL of the 'people' forums to a sub-forum of off-topic. And be default skip-filtered just like the other non-Lego forums. By your own admission this topic - that has nothing to do with Lego in any way is ok, then it (...) (22 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.people.lgbt, lugnet.admin.suggestions) !
| | | | | Re: Is LUGNET what you really want? (Was: Re: Lavender Brick Society)
|
| (...) LOL at obscure reference to infamous .Space history! (I didn't see your link to that thread until typing this reply, because the HTML link was only applied to the last period you typed.) I've no idea where to FUT this, so I'll leave it (...) (22 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.people, lugnet.org)
| | | | | Re: Geobra Society
|
| (...) I don't think so. Someone wishing that one set of voices be silenced (or that they "shut their ignorant piehole") doesn't mean that it's going to happen. Them saying so gives the community a chance to respond and determine its stance on the (...) (22 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.people, FTX) !
| | | | | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
| (...) Here’s my vote for: fanatical.christian-...zealot.org JAL wrote: “The fifth reason is that homosexuality is NOT a tolerant lifestyle. It is an immoral, hateful, bigoted, sexist, discriminatory, intolerant, deviant, and even racist lifestyle.” (...) (22 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.org)
| | | | | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
| Nope, what I was saying is that your own preconceived biases made you assume that someone asking for a hetero group at this present time was doing so 'to get even/keep up with the homosexual Joneses' rather than it being a legitimate request. You (...) (22 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.people, lugnet.org)
| | | | | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
| In lugnet.people, Jesse Alan Long wrote: (snipping to focus on the "best" parts) (...) When reading this huge thread, I saw many posts that were beyond good taste, many that had no basis in fact, many that made preposterous statements, many that (...) (22 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.org, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
| To quote the masterwork film, Big Trouble in Little China: "Are you crazy? Is that your problem?" I'd like to advocate for a newsgroup, lugnet.people.jessealanlong so that your comedic stylings can be preserved for future generations. Jesse, don't (...) (22 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.org) !
| | | | | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
| Major snippage If this is my last time on here, (...) Wait a second here, are you trying to say that your post makes sense? I can only hope that your poor sentence construction, and seeming logical falacies are actually just translation problems (...) (22 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.org)
| | | | | Re: Is LUGNET what you really want? (Was: Re: Lavender Brick Society)
|
| Hello! (...) It still makes me feel good. It's not what I had expected when I sent the money but that doesn't mean I'm disappointed. I would not want to leave. Where else is it possible to discuss anything and everything with people who you don't (...) (22 years ago, 18-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.people, lugnet.org)
| | | | | Re: Is LUGNET what you really want? (Was: Re: Lavender Brick Society)
|
| (...) Except it'd more likely be lugnet.people.(your country).(your state).(your city).(your street).kyle., just in the unforseen circumstance that there is another Kyle. Don't get me wrong, I reckon lugnet.(incredibly convoluted heirarchy).kyle (...) (22 years ago, 18-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.people, lugnet.org, FTX)
| | | | | Is LUGNET what you really want? (Was: Re: Lavender Brick Society)
|
| (...) Wow, controversy on LUGNET. Will wonders never cease? ;] Damn I'm going to regret this. Oh well, as long as my post is more coherent than JAL's, I've done good. ;] I have formed a theory. Here's a pictorial representation of part of my theory: (...) (22 years ago, 18-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.people, lugnet.org)
| | | | | Re: Geobra Society
|
| (...) Yes, how many past cultures have had socially accepted, civilly conducted, racially- or caste-based slavery? And how many free democracies still consider it to be acceptable today? (22 years ago, 18-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.people, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Geobra Society
|
| (...) type of (...) Well.. wich one is that? I´d say that there are 2 sides and both of them want theirs to be the "only one". (...) Yes, indeed. (...) /J (22 years ago, 18-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.people)
| | | | | Re: Geobra Society
|
| (...) Looks like there are some who want to make this a place where only one type of opinion is respected. Sad. And, may I mention, bad for the community? -Tim (22 years ago, 18-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.people, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Geobra Society
|
| Hello! (...) Oh, it wasn't meant completely unserious. For example (URL) this> was inspired by (URL) this>. And (URL) this> was built after (URL) this>. I did several other "Renditions" of Playmobil models in LEGO in the past that are not documented (...) (22 years ago, 18-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.people, lugnet.org, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Geobra Society
|
| (...) 1. Let's not make this into an issue with two sides. 2. Differences of opinion are good, so long as we remember to respect the opinions of others. --Todd (22 years ago, 18-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.people, FTX)
|
|
